are you sure that this parking is not for LoanDepot Park, because if it is then I am not sure that access=private would be appropriate.

if you look at the imagery this is a oneway

looking at their website I do not think that access=no is warranted https://hachidoggrooming.com/

I am unsure this is private, do you have proof that this is only for private use because to me this seems more like public parking (maybe with a fee associated).

this is staff parking so access=employees is correct.

this is staff parking so access=employees is correct.

Ok, I implemented a fix in 171597335, but I am not 100% sure of the tagging of the footways so I have brought it up in the OSMUS slack: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C6E4S4CQG/p1757267057670689

so, just to clarify the bikes share lanes with cars, aka cycleway=shared_lane would be applicable, is that correct?
for context the relevant wiki page would be cycleway=shared_lane.

as with changeset/171522294 in this changeset you added something tagged as a footway but based on the imagery it looks like a bike lane, so is way/1427629238 a bike lane or are pedestrians also allowed to walk on it.

my bad, forgot to fix the addr:street_address when I copied the address data over from ATP, I will be more careful next time.

next time please provide more address tags, especially the associated street of the address, and when you add a name to an address please add some tag describing what it is like office=*, amenity=* or any other such tags.

happy mapping,
Udar.

please stop adding objects that are just one address tag and a name without any other tags to specify what it is.

based on the imagery way/1427418996 looks more like a bike lane then a footway, is for pedestrians and bicyclists or just bikes?

the location seems incorrect as I don't see any evidence of a camp ground at this location

why did you delete the map (node/6956220575 ), what is you source for it no longer existing.

I doubt that this business takes up this whole building.

both these toilets seem to be duplicates

why did you add this as a circle when it obviously is not on the imagery. This also messed up the g4eoemtry of the existing building and added a unnecessary area=yes.

I am assuming that this means that the "Orchid House" hotel has closed, is that true?

thank you, based on the imagery provided the work looks relatively good.