Timmy_Tesseract's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 98062850 | Hello again. Since you're back at adding lots of shops and restaurants it would be nice if you could comment on this! Have a nice evening. |
|
| 103036723 | Hello ortegajovan41. You're adding a lot of shops and amenities. Did you visit all of them yourself or are you using information from another map or database? |
|
| 101495695 | Thanks for pointing this out. I've removed the problematic way. I also noticed that ending the service road at the outline of the apron resulted in a validation error. I connected it directly to the taxiway instead (as the whole surface area of the aeroway can be accessed through this road). Could you have another look to doublecheck if this conforms with conventions? |
|
| 101495695 | Hello Zaculeu. Not every airport has gates and fences. This one does not only serve as a roadway for traffic heading to Punta Maria, it's also completely open for anyone from playing kids to bikers to people practicing how to drive ;) I've removed the non-existent access restrictions for you. Have a nice day! |
|
| 100688862 | Hello Cabinet23. Thank you for your contributions to OSM. When you find things to be in the wrong location please just move them instead of deleting and creating a new object. I've restored the old nodes for Barangays 87 and 90 (see changeset/103285918) as they had many other tags in addition to just name and place. This also preserves the past edit history. By the way, the correct place tag for barangays is village or quarter. Town is meant for municipalities. For more details you could check the OSM wiki. Keep up the good work! |
|
| 59469530 | Hello Seasalt. What is the source for the name of this village? |
|
| 102258465 | Hello lawrence_ruiz. Thank you for your contributions. This mountain is quite far away from any actual peak. You could use OpenTopoMap to see the elevation profile of the area. I already moved it to the nearest possible location, do you wanna check if I got it right? Keep up the good work! |
|
| 102770134 | It is clearly visible on aerial imagery that there are no fords at node/8620445559 and 8620445558 and that the lower parts of the stream that you added takes a very different course than what you mapped. Also I have on the ground knowledge that there is no bridge at way/929514995. Please don't add non-existent things to OSM. |
|
| 102897184 | Hello. Please have a look at the local as well as the general mapping conventions for road classifications. None of the roads that you upgraded to primary and trunk seem to meet the definitions. Also please have a look at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Sarangani is hundreds of kilometers away from the edits in this changeset and "Waypoint" does not describe well the huge amount of changes to well established road classifications that you made. |
|
| 102777975 | Good day gillhsu. The road link that you added (way/929553066) does not exist. Please only connect roads when they're clearly visible on aerial imagery. As for way/929553067, this would be better tagged as service than unclassified. There are detailled descriptions of all highway tags on the OSM wiki. Happy mapping! |
|
| 102777841 | Good day yuehtsai, please always make sure to download all the existing data in an area before adding new roads. This way you will avoid adding duplicates of roads that already exist in the database. Also please have a look at the definitions of motorway and residential roads. I've reverted this changeset. |
|
| 100602881 | Thank you for reassessing this. Keep up the good work! |
|
| 97873610 | Thank you for having another look. Keep up the good work! |
|
| 101291230 | Hello. What is your source for the separated lanes at way/542743944? I've passed by this road many times and there is no such separation. This can also clearly be seen on aerial imagery. and strava heatmaps. |
|
| 87203219 | Hello Dolf. You might have missed the second part of the trunk definition: "Continuous stretch of highway between large cities (population 100,000+)" ;) |
|
| 100602881 | Good day HikkaduwaBeach. What guidelines are you using for deciding on road classifications? It seems that the previous classification of the roads leading to the municipalities of Tarangnan and Pagsanghan were in accordance with the local mapping conventions. |
|
| 100230874 | Good day Raenbow. For entrances and exits to underground or multi storey parking facilities there's the more specific tag amenity=parking_entrance. Thank you. |
|
| 97873610 | Hello AntelopeCliif. It is difficult to assess road classifications from aerial imagery alone, even more so if roads are barely visible due to high building density. Please always check way histories. Many of the previous classifications were based on ground surveys. |
|
| 98699733 | Good day RockCreekPark. Naujan is a major municipality with more than 100'000 inhabitants. It seems that the previous classification of this road was in accordance with the local mapping conventions. |
|
| 101468680 | Good evening. What source are these numbers based on? Only numbers assigned by DPWH should be used with ref tag on roads. |