Timmy_Tesseract's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 101019944 | Hello again. Which bank in Sirib? Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.
|
|
| 101022995 | Hello sveeb. What would you like to have updated about bukidnon road? Also please read the conventions that the community has for road classifications (osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions). For example the roads connecting Magkuno to the highway are very minor roads in comparison to the existing tertiary roads connecting from Crossing Quarry and Crossing 20 to Angalan/Balengaeng. |
|
| 100451374 | Hello superwaih, please make sure to download all the existing data in an area before adding new objects to avoid duplications. And please check the OSM road classification guidelines, those road that you tagged as tertiary and primary are all just residentials. Thank you. |
|
| 99734758 | Good day BidasoaRiver of course, sorry for the mix-up. |
|
| 99734758 | Good day FluteButte. In accordance with the "One feature, one OSM element principle" it seems to be preferable not to add ford=yes on a node if the tag is already found on the respective way. Otherwise the ford will be rendered twice (see node/8443498680). Also by changing this ford from track to unclassified you removed the important information that this is a natural riverbed and not a road. Adding the tags surface=ground and smoothness=horrible might be an appropriate alternative to tagging it as track. |
|
| 100418978 | Good day FluteButte. In accordance with the "One feature, one OSM element principle" it seems to be preferable not to add ford=yes on a node if the tag is already found on the respective way. Otherwise the ford will be rendered twice. Thanks and keep up the good work! |
|
| 99950961 | Also I'm curious from where you know the location of all of these points of interests. Are you doing on the ground surveys? Or are you copying from another database? |
|
| 99950961 | Good evening Darryl. This gas station already existed. Same with the nearby Varsity Inn. Please be more careful to avoid duplicates like these. And also please read this wiki article about changeset comments: [osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments] |
|
| 97429864 | Good day san_deep. Please don't add bridges if they are not very clearly visible on imagery. The bridge that you added here does not exist, there's not even a stream. |
|
| 94962421 | Hello Eric. Are all of these really camp sites? Some of them seem to be hundreds of meters away from the nearest trail. |
|
| 99559029 | Good day Zaculeu. I upgraded this from residential to unclassified. Please review the local usage of these two classifications. (osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions#Roads). Thank you and keep up the good work! |
|
| 100000051 | Changeset mix-up, proper comment is: [Kauswagan, Panabo City] surface updated |
|
| 100000585 | + [Cabanatuan, Nueva Ecija] floating roads reviewed, missing access restrictions fixed #Kaart |
|
| 98513041 | Thank you for fixing. Keep up the good work! =) |
|
| 81151710 | Hey bambambiram, sometimes the suggested locations of the schools are a bit off. You can always check the address tags to see if the coordinates are near the right barangay or municipality. This one was about 80 km away, but I fixed it already =) |
|
| 98062850 | Good day. The store that you added here is in the middle of the road and it lacks proper tagging. It seems like you copied the location and many others from Google Maps. Unfortunately this data is under a license that is not compatible with OSM. Is all of the data that you added from Google or did you also use other sources? |
|
| 98513041 | Good day nandi_ram, please watch out for noexit=yes before adding missing links. (noexit=*) |
|
| 99555218 | Good evening JPBaje. You're adding a lot of shops and amenities. Did you visit all of them yourself or are you using information from another map or database? If so please mention the source in your changeset comments. Also please have a look at this page: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
|
| 98682324 | Thanks for the revert. Tertiary roads transitioning to unclassified are very common, especially in mountainous areas. Usually there is a lot of traffic from villages downwards towards the city, but almost no traffic to the farms further uphill or to villages that are on the other side of steep river valleys. |
|
| 98682324 | Good day ruthikdhoni, Ways 487023332, 666813290, 871160306 and 871160306 are all very rough unpaved road sections that are barely passable by cars. Tertiary really doesn't seem like the right choice. way/173057391 on the other side connects the barangay proper of Kilate to the greater network and should therefore be tagged as tertiary according to the Philippines mapping conventions. Assessing the classification of roads can be difficult from aerial imagery alone. Before up- or downgrading please check way histories to see if existing classifications might have been sourced from on the ground surveys. |