Thanks for fixing that. I'd fixed another one on Kingsford Smith I'd incorrectly tagged oneway, but had missed this one. Not sure what happened. Brain fade?

Hi,

Did you get permission to us DCDB in OSM?

If you did then please add an entry to:

osm.wiki/Contributors#Queensland_Government_data

with the correspondence and wavier form.

Otherwise please don't import this to OSM.

Thank you.

Is there any particular reason you don't like residential areas?

This changeset has been reverted. The first step for an import is to discuss it on talk-au:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

This changeset has been reverted.

The first step for an import is to discuss it on talk-au:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55150655

Hello!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55151214

No, this was a screw-up.

I have put the coastlines back in at #54161930.

There were three natural=beach that were removed and I've put them back in at #54164396, however these are now tagged both natural=sand (at relation level) and natural=beach (at way level) and at least one of them doesn't look like a beach:
way/183254975

And one mud flat in #54164440 which was tagged water at the relation level but I changed back to mud as that was the original tagging:

http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3007187

Grass not heath

Grass not heath

Did you mean:

landcover=grass

for:

way/543211807 ?

Hi,

There is no heath in Australia. I think you'll need to use a better tag for:

way/543211886

Street sign, G-NAF and LPI says Douglas Street. I think you can safely arm-chair this one.

Hi.

Alternative names get tagged alt_name=Turning Japanese (see: name=*).

Yeap, I've seen the same style sign on the Hume. They line up with the NSW tourism regions:

https://www.destinationnsw.com.au/tourism/facts-and-figures/sydney-tourism-statistics

I guess if that's what admin_level 7 should be then we need to change the definition.

I was thinking that if you really don't like this definition of level 7 then we could change this to boundary=statistical stats_level=SUA. I find this type of boundary useful as I don't have the wherewithal to run my own spatial database but I can use these in Overpass.

Hi

tracktype=grade7 ? Did you mean grade5? or is this some system other than tracktype?

That should of said: Fixed note #1176717

osm.wiki/Attribution/data.brisbane.qld.gov.au_explicit_permission

Inner way only touches outer way a one point. This is a valid multipolygon, no need to edit.

Would be better to use the note key. The description key is really just for SEO spam (or at least that's what 99+% of the use appears to be).