They are not included because they are in effect "negative reserves". Normally you can't fish in a National Park, however some parts of them have restricted fishing allowed. See https://www.legislation.tas.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/sr-2019-067#JS2@EN So there is no "Port Davey Marine Reserve", but there are parts of the Southwest National Park where you are allowed to carry out some fishing.

I would have thought the bigger problem would be that this is now a U-GO servo. Also, why would they sell diesel (fuel:GTL_diesel = yes) and not allow hgv?

Hi,

This changeset broke the boundaries of Chatswood and Roseville. When JOSM tells you that a way is used in a boundary relation it is a good idea to pay attention to that and not just delete ways.

Thanks.

This changeset has been reverted because it broke the boundaries of Greenwich (2013719) and three other suburbs.

changeset/171000340

It crazy complicated. There is relation/8383494 (Montebello Islands Conservation Park). Which has been gazetted in 2 parts. I have not put them in separately because it's getting busy enough as it is. They have the same name and IUCN category. There is relation/16229842 Montebello Islands Marine Park which has four different IUCN category areas that are mapped as sub-areas of this relation.

Hi,

Do you know if you can exit the centre via node/13070375209 ? From the aerial imagery it looks like you should be able to walk out to the car park.

Thanks.

Hi,

I fixed the motor_vehicle:conditional on node/13075257284 However, you've got locked=yes which means the gate is "usually locked and not accessible without the key" and opening_hours = 24/7 which indicates the gate is always open. You might want to adjust those.

Thanks.

Hi,

Just for future reference: for a pedestrian crossing with no line markings or traffic signals, the correct tag is crossing=unmarked. I have fixed these ones.

Thanks.

OK. Was just worried if you were running a script it might have needed a small change.

Cheers.

It's not clear what "autofix" means here, but you've added another reference to node/1800088617 in relation/16692201 which is not valid.

Thanks.

I added a citation needed. Let's see how long till they delete that ;-)

I'm not sure that this belongs in OSM. I have never heard anyone refer to this area as "Brickfield Hill" and everything I can find online says "was known as" (except for Brickfield Hospitality, who would like you to call it that for obvious reasons).

Maybe something for OpenHistoryMap?

This is not "Cape Le Grand" it's the Lucky Bay camping area.

This is not "Booth" it's Caloola Farm. https://www.facebook.com/caloolafarm/

Booth is not a settlement.

OSM place classification is not based on Wikipedia

changeset/169545546

Can't help you then.

You're going to have to be more specific than that.

Wrong changeset. You may have more luck asking at changeset/166964739

Hi,

Two questions:

1. What is "IRC" and do we have permission to use whatever that is in OSM?

2. Is the name of these roads really "Needs A Name Road"?

Thanks.

Meh. It's OSM, so there's two ways of tagging something. I had just been using both because it's not that much more effort. I would have most likely just fixed it when I get round to checking CAPAD.

Thanks for letting me know.