access:conditional= Oct-Mar 06:00-18:30, Apr-Sep 07:00-16:30

Which is what was there before does not mean anything.

As to which way around you'd like the default to be if a data consumer can't digest a conditional, that'd would depend on what you think the safer option would be.

One of them still kinda works... it's got a sub parked on it. Maybe add a historic tag?

Either way they are not dry docks.

:thumbsup:

Turns out the global usage of addr:shop is 13. There is also only about 1100 addr:unit with "shop" in it https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/203S.

There were 9 uses of addr:shop in Australia and 489,000 of addr:unit.

Two out of about 3500 is not actually that many https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/graph.png?country=australia%2a&item=1270

The almost junction test will be looking for things like a corridor that end within 10m of some other highway as they might be errors. In this case it isn't, so noexit is to flag that it's OK.

What determines if a room is routable is the software you'd be using.

Hi,

https://ballaratopendata.org.au/dataset/ballarat-shared-paths is licenced as CC-BY 3.0. To use this is OSM you need to have got a waiver signed by Ballarat council.

Have you done this first?

Thanks.

None of it's on the Sentinel-2 image from a week ago. I have removed it.

Indoor stuff should be connected to the outdoor network for routing. In hind sight I should have been able to guess where this one went, but you can't always tell from aerial imagery.

company's not companies...thanks brain.

According to companies website this does not exist. Deleted.

Oh dear, I'd already asked about changeset/162216653

Anyway third time's the charm changeset/162300487

Please have a look and change it if it looks wrong. Personally I would have just not bothered trying to split Lowanna.

Thanks.

Hi,

This edit has cut off the right turn into and out of way/183314438 at the East Derwent Hwy. This does not line up with what's in the aerial or street level imagery. Has the median been closed recently?

Happy mapping.

A more interesting question would be: what router are you using that can't tell it's either straight on or left turn with out a manoeuvre relations?

PS:

If you make one of them fork then the other one needs to also be fork, or if you want the other one to be continue then it needs to be turn.

There are already no right turns on this way:
relation/12208167
relation/9089346

In the help menu in iD you will find an entry for relations, this has a description of how to add turn restrictions.

That's not how IUCN categories are assigned see https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/pag-021.pdf

The IUCN categories are based on management intent. How do you know what the intent of the owner of this land is? Have they published that somewhere?

It's not in CAPAD so I was unable to verify the protect class.

If you read the wiki page linked above, you will find that this import proposal was discussed in May 2021. It was discussed again in the Oceania category on the OSM Community forum in December 2024.

If you don't participate in the AU community discussions, then I don't know how you expect to be involved.

The requirement that the tag value be a name or just a word was added by one user in Sep 2021 osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Key%3Aname%3Aetymology&diff=prev&oldid=2200202 with (as far as I can tell) no discussion on the forum or the tagging mail list.

As it currently stands it makes the tag useless because all you get is stuff like John Smith Street name:etymology= John Smith. It doesn't tell you anything. When I've used it I've put in a short bibliographic sketch that points out who it is and why they are important enough to have something named after them eg way/436816913

Maybe this debate should move to tagging on the forum?