Just noticed this lately, this edit removed a lot of street name suffixes I added (while keeping it on the others). I think we should move toward using full street names (official street name signs might drop them, but they are included in the name used in addresses)

[Lipa, Batangas] add/modify roads and POIs, tag bus stops

Bing: currently has aerials for Congressional under construction past Panteon. There is ongoing bridge construction to the Islands, but is still not on present aerial coverage.

I see this edit is done to fill a network gap created by the Daang Hari flyover (currently classified as primary), but I would better think all the stretches of road from Kawit to Dasma parallel to Aguinaldo are immer roads. I'll undo this plus and the classification of the flyover.

Just a note, please realign any imagery to existing GPX tracks (Bing and Maxar images for Batangas City area is offset).

Huh, primary? For national tertiary, depends on situation. I think it could've been correct Molino-Paliparan (and Bacoor Boulevard) are just secondary and Aguinaldo south of Tirona all the way to Tagaytay primary (as well as Tagaytay-Nasugbu and Naic-Ternate-Nasugbu), but that would be a drastic change unless CALAEX Kawit-Silang gets opened (eliminating redundancy). Aw, there 's too much secondaries around DBB, and the previous map was just the right thing. Secondary could have been applied to Congressional extension to The Islands instead to main road at St. Charbel, and dead-end secondary should've been fine (considering future extensions).

A week ago after a major edit around Laoang, but why restore them to trunk? Even with the construction of missing road link, it's still far from trunk status.

Those are mostly approximation from official sources. I've already marked part TR5 Lucena-Matnog (then QBX or QUEBEX) as proposed (pending notice to proceed for Lucena-Gumaca), but for TR4 Sto. Tomas - Lucena, agree they should be retagged as only the Taong section (around Villa Escudero) is being built.

Bike lanes restored at changeset/93638298

Just received your direct message, but it's an exaggeration to say this edit is a serious mistaken and your rants doesn't help. Sorry, but I'm mapping from outside the country.

I'm stuck with an edit in Nueva Ecija, so Paul, hold on. I'll undelete those bike lanes, plus alignment fixes.

Correction: "Yaman" should be "Yamaha" (editing from tablet)

Have been watching your last edits, but please use more specific edit comments than unclear "finding stuff/things". Also, you should have marked the closed-off sections of Carnation with gate than chopping it off and makeing them dead-end.

You could have been mapped them as road attribute (cycleway=) than a separate line.

Just been editing Evia to fix bad edits by "cosmicadobo" but you've restored a previous note that sounds like some legal notice than a useful note for mappers (and no, I don't see any no-jaywalking or "bawal tumawid" signage anywhere at the roundabout/rotonda except the "Prohibited on Expressway" at the MCX entrance). Also, there are sidewalks from Daang Reyna to Biazon and Daang Hari, so foot=no also affects ped routing around the area.

Which terminal do route 24 actually use? South Station, or Starmall?

I find part of your reply hard to read. I'm fine with standardizing things, though using "Arrivals" sounds rather foreign, and we usually say that on airports and ferry terminals.

Last thing, bus terminal arrivals area is usually for unloading only, but it's not always the case. We usually call the arrivals area of a bus terminal unloading or "babaan", so no need to push for "Arrivals" until signs change.

I'm still working with a major edit in Batangas City, but why replace "Unloading" with "Arrivals"? Just because the jeepney terminal is named with "Departures".

tl;dr, but I still see the roads connecting the exit with Sta Rosa-Tagaytay as part of the exit complex, unless this one is some stub connecting to some proposed or unfinished expressway.

Just to add up, if the provincial routes get reactivated sometime, I think they have far more limited stops north of Dasma to avoid competing with city buses.

Also, if the "extension" of Route 28 is just for buses headed back to garage (not carrying passengers), then that should be restored to end at Pala-pala.

What's with the foot=no tags on Lucena Grand Terminal access roads? Tested ped routing from arrivals/unloading/intraprovincial departures to jeepney terminal, and cannot create route. Please help eliminate incorrect uses of foot=no for no ped crossing/jaywalking since we've agreed on that.