reverted. Please don't delete features you don't understand

changeset/161066336

This was the subject of a block from 5 months ago. Please read it.
Google is not allowed as a source.
osm.org/user_blocks/16499

Welcome to OSM!
Name should be left blank in this case.
osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Hello
Why was this ramp tagged as a path?
way/38176253
Is the ramp being demolished?
osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

idk

Access=private tag was added in changeset/105234265
See https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/250656452

This changeset left impossible oneway at node/5935832732

This changeset removed highway tags
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160731926

Could you confirm whether this is complete as mapped here? changeset/160531993

>But why would you repeat etymology data for ever road segment?

It's more accessible for data consumers.

Also to clarify, etymology should be tagged on all the named features where it applies and being tagged on the relation doesn't negate that.
See also name:etymology=*

OSMCha works well for visualizing
https://osmcha.org/changesets/160690969

changeset/160745951

** https://osmcha.org/changesets/160690552
This is 100% definitively the changeset that introduced it sorry for spam.

* https://osmcha.org/changesets/160736531

Sorry wrong changeset. Disconnect was introduced in https://osmcha.org/changesets/160700821

This changeset left a missing connection. Fixed in changeset/160736531
Please make sure you have the relevant JOSM validators enabled to warn about these.
Thanks

changeset/160690969 deleted the highway tags as well.
Also there is no reason to remove etymology.
Reverted

changeset/160736495

changeset/160690969 deleted the highway tags as well.
Also there is no reason to remove etymology.
Reverted

changeset/160736495

changeset/160690969 deleted the highway tags as well.
Also there is no reason to remove etymology.
Reverted

changeset/160736495