way/280956142

openstreetmap.org/way/280956142

Access=no means nobody including cars are allowed. This breaks routers Please don't do this. The correct tag for disallowing foot traffic is foot=no
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140680952

Thanks for contributing.

Looks like you accidentally removed highway=trunk from way/532104801

source?

Reviewed
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140659723

The downtown area has several businesses and apartment buildings that already have the addresses that were added in this changeset. 100 Corrina, 110 Corrina, 100 East Main for example.

The internal service roads and north and west side are yes. But the south and east side has publicly accessible roads especially to RA3. I've tagged these as permissive.

thanks for doing this btw

Are you planning to finish conflation so there's less duplication?

Why did you tag all the roads as private?

Is this being monitored for completion?

Why was valid data removed?

Thank you

Reviewed
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147878437

Please don't delete and re-add data. osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

Hi ratrun. For obvious mistakes like this that harm the map significantly please consider fixing it right away.
This changeset has been reverted in full by changeset/148229370

What is the meaning of name=21 etc.?

Please don't tag unrelated paths as golf paths.

That would be opening_hours=*. You just put a checkdate on 3 mistagged "offices".