OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
167200299

idk

167200626

This is fantastic. Thank you for writing this out. I have to be honest, I thought aerial imagery was basically a live feed of reality. It never even occurred to me that it could be outdated, or that crucial information might exist on things called "traffic signs" on the actual ground.
Your breakdown of "facts" (from signs) versus "assumptions" (from old pictures) is a complete game-changer for me. I'm saving this as my new guide. It’s a whole new world of mapping now. I can’t thank you enough for this wisdom.
All the best ;D

167200299

Any restriction on continuing straight is covered by access and/or oneway tags on the relevant way.
The restriction made way/1210491993 inaccessible.

167200626

Apologies. It was based off aerial imagery and the seeming absurdity of only allowing left turns when right turns are simpler. I concede I was wrong and have reverted both changesets.

152293790

The only_left_turn restriction disallowed bikes going straight.
no_right_turn restriction usually better in such scenarios to avoid unintended consequences.

159022458

The only_left_turn restriction forced Riverside Drive traffic to do a U-turn.
Removed.

166831130

Why was the tag removed? The way still provides connections.

166528408

Please make sure to fix warnings like impossible oneway.

166809426

This changeset left a bunch of dead-end oneway roads.
What is the new layout?

162246233

way/1357790026

162246233

Why did you add restrictions like only_u_turn?

163362346

Lanes should not be mapped as separate ways.

163268875

This seems highly unlikely.
Removed.

165136699

This changeset changed no_left_turn restriction to only_left_turn

164616765

This changeset added an only_left_turn restriction disallowing through traffic.

165843843

This changeset added an only_left_turn restriction

165309461

This changeset added an only_left_turn restriction.

166553933

The geometry and turn restrictions are incorrect. way/1388447167
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166553933

166555269

Not needed since it was already the only possibility.

165887271

reverted for now.
If it's really demolished add the appropriate lifecycle tags and provide a source please.

changeset/166283051