Hi - I think something went a bit wrong here. The footpath way/41936119/history somehow got extended all the way up Alfreton road (the fact that that has a footpath either side of the road is already there; there's a "sidewalk=both" tag on way/5042757 that you can see if you click "all tags" over in the editor).

Where was the gym you were trying to add (I'm guessing based on the changeset comment)? Was it perhaps way/251920394 , or another one somewhere else?
Cheers,
Andy
PS - hope you don't mind me asking, just trying to help.

Can you remember what sort of shops node/3278263024 and node/3278247063 were? They're currently "shop=survey"

Hope you don't mind - I've changed "VapER+" here from "shop=vaping" to "e-cigarette", on the assumption that they're equivalent tags. Let me know if you think that's wrong.

Hope you don't mind - I've changed "Flavour Vapour" here from "shop=vaping" to "e-cigarette", on the assumption that they're equivalent tags. Let me know if you think that's wrong.

Hello,
It looks like there was a problem with this upload. Two of the relations were "emptied" as they were uploaded. I'f restored both back to their previous state, so all should be OK now.

It might have happened because both relations have a large number of members, or a problem with JOSM itself. If you see the problem happen again don't worry, it's easy to fix - just mention it on help.openstreetmap.org, on one of the mailing lists, or on IRC in #OSM.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse)

(traducción automática)
Hola,
Parece que hay un problema con esta subida. Dos de las relaciones se "vació", ya que se han subido. He restaurado tanto volver a su estado anterior, por lo que todos deben estar bien ahora.
Podría haber sucedido debido a que ambas relaciones tienen un gran número de miembros, o un problema con el propio JOSM. Si usted ve el problema vuelva a ocurrir no se preocupe, es fácil de solucionar - sólo lo menciona en help.openstreetmap.org, en una de las listas de correo o en el IRC en #OSM.
Atentamente,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse)

Whereabouts? The only information boards I can remember are the heavily stylised ones like http://www.heavygoods.org.uk/PICT4150.JPG . I don't remember seeing any with elevations on.

(for anyone thinking of reverting) the changes in the Chesterfield/Mansfield area in this changeset seem OK.

Unnecessary, probably, but unlike some of the other changes in this sequence they don't actually make the data wrong.

Hi,
at way/240521546/history#map=15/53.7483/-0.3213 you've changed "shop=electricals" to "shop=electrical". However, I'm not convinced that they necessarily have exactly the same meaning. "shop=electricals" implies domestic electrical appliances rather than the electrical supplies that would be suggested by "shop=electrical". People have used various tags for the former category and one of the others such as domestic_appliances or white_goods might have been a better suggestion than electrical.

For rendering purposes I had a look at what people used in the UK in both the "electric" and "white_goods" areas - they're at https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L784 . "electricals" was rare enough that I didn't notice it when compiling that list, so some alternative tag makes sense, but I'd suggest asking the previous mapper what sort of shop it actually is. I'd guess that in 2 out of 3 of these "electrical" isn't the best option.

Hi - just wondered if the deletion of the footpath way/41775979/history was deliberate here? It's ages since I've walked any of the paths on the "other" side of the Lees road, but it does seem to match GPS traces....

Would it be possible to explain the logic behind this change please (specifically, the numbers in use of each tag before your mechanical edit)? The changeset comment here "dance_school -> dancing_school" just describes what you did, not why.

Also, whereabouts did you explain to people who might be consuming this data that you're going to change it?

You've said "Added from OS OOC" here but what's the source of the elevation? At first glance I don't see it on any of the OS OOC maps available within iD (via the editor imagery index).

Thanks, easily done. I've moved the bus stop back in changeset/36819607 .

Thanks for fixing that - a number of paths around here seem to have been added based on where Strava users have been, and they don't always seem to bother about access rights!

Hi - I think that a bus stop accidentally got dragged to form part of a building way/62094135 - do you mind if I move it back to where it was (or has the bus stop really moved near the building)?

In this case I'd be tempted to ask the previous mapper whether it's been built yet. It's quite likely it wasn't when they added it, but might have been now. Also, you could ask them what it's (now) called?

Re "I shall recheck the licensing information" (given that the elevation here doesn't seem to have come from an Open source):

As previously discussed the DoBIH http://www.hills-database.co.uk/downloads.html is licensed according to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en_GB and according to osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility is incompatible because of incompatible attribution requirements. If you want to explicitly use their data you'll need to get direct permission. In changeset/33256350 you said that you would do this. Have you done so and if so what was the result?

I got the bus past here the other week, and it's actually a B&M Homestore (the "upmarket" one) rather than a B&M Bargains. I've gone with department_store because that's actually the most popular tag for these; but am open to other suggestions...

Just wondered if you got a chance to see if way/363227213 still exists? I walked past on the main road a couple of weeks ago, and it looks like "Prospect Court" is new-build residential - http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?zoom=18&lat=53.05057&lon=-1.39343&layers=B0TT&view_mode=pseudorandom has it not including the southern bit

In here you have created a duplicate Nags Head way/318374093 and relation/4298180 . I suspect that this changeset may need to be reverted too.

For info, reverted in changeset/36750809 .