Hi (just for info) you can't use Google Maps or Google Earth in order to add data to OSM - their terms of service don't permit it.
Presumably that's not what you're doing here though (I guess you're just using it to illustrate something that you've already mapped by other means).
Anyway, hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help. Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Andy

Hello,
Would it be possible to explain what changes you have made here? "Corrections avec Osmose" doesn't really explain anything.
Also, it's a changeset that covers a huge area - it'll occur in lots of people's "history" lists. Would it be possible in future to use smaller areas?
Best Regards,
Andy
Bonjour,
Serait-il possible d'expliquer les changements que vous avez fait ici? "Corrections avec Osmose" n'explique pas vraiment quoi que ce soit.
En outre, il est un changeset qui couvre une vaste zone - il va se produire dans beaucoup de listes "histoire". Serait-il possible à l'avenir d'utiliser des zones plus petites?
Meilleures salutations,
Andy

"mobile-phone" on node/3982283906/history was clearly not a misspelling; did you explain to the previous mapper why you made the change? If you don't, next time they'll use "mobile-phone" again.

relation/6074901 isn't correct. Traffic from the west can carry on along the ring road as well as turn right. It can't turn left. You'd need to survey it to see if u-turns are prohibited here.
There will be other similar restrictions at the other nodes too.

Hi,
You've changed one of the keys on here. I'm not sure what it was used for, but did you ask the person who added it to find out why?
Best Regards,
Andy

Is way/401407063 really called "Barn" given it's location?

Would it be possible to explain in a bit more detail about what the change actually was here? "#to-fix:highwayhighway" doesn't actually say anything.

Also, although it only affects two areas they're on the other side of the planet, so this changeset appears in the history list of everyone in the northern hemisphere :)

Hi - just spotted node/860110003 in Bakewell. I'm guessing that "Fisn" but just be a typo? Also, if it's really shut, I'd suggest changing the main tag to "disused:amenity=fast_food" to make it obvious that you can't get fish and chips here currently?
Cheers,
Andy
(not local, but an occasional customer of Track and Trail just down the road)

Hi Just for info, - Bing is offset here. You've moved way/100530581 so it matches the Bing imagery, not the reality. I'd suggest that you move it back. You can use the underlying GPS traces (especially on narrow paths) to align the imagery.

Would it be possible to explain in a bit more detail about what the change actually was here? "#to-fix:highwayhighway" doesn't actually say anything.

Also what are the turn restrictions at node/2667031585 ?

In this case I'd change it back to how it was before trex123 edited it, and explain the reason in the changeset comment. That user only made 2 edits; it looks like they were experimenting with editing rather than anything else. If anything still looks doubtful, add an OSM note.

@AnkEric If re-survey is not an option, I'd suggest adding an OSM note so that local mappers and visitors can check.
Changing something that is detectably wrong to something undetectably wrong makes the quality of OSM data worse, not better.

Thanks - was just about to delete!

Look at the history of node/622357042/history again - you can see who changed what to what when. The merging of a suburb with a bowling alley is surely a mistake.

Are you living in Addis? What suggested to you to make this "Fixed point and area." changeset in the first place? I'm not being rude; just genuinely trying to understand what you were trying to do.
What

node/622357042/history was added as a suburb in changeset/3953650 . That might be wrong, it might not be a suburb, but there is a railway station with that name just to the southwest.

Hi,
It looks like the changeset here has removed the suburb details. Currently way/51078424 and node/622357042 are duplicate bowling alleys, but node/622357042/history was originally a suburb.

That source seems to be "2014 © UrbanRail.Net by Robert Schwandl". Have you asked to use the data under an appropriate licence?

Great stuff - thanks for fixing.

You've mapped relation/5598576 as natural=water. Are you sure that it is? It looks like neither lake nor meadow to me.

On the imagery it doesn't look like a rest area at all - I can't see any facilities there.
Depending on the traffic on the road there may well be a need for a large passing place for extra-wide traffic to pass each other; alternatively it may be an informal parking area or simply an entrance to some forest tracks that we can't see on the imagery. I've not been there and neither I suspect have you.
If you don't understand why something is tagged as it is please don't just change it to something that you do understand but is very probably wrong. Perhaps add an OSM note saying that passing places aren't usually mapped as areas (and certainly aren't usually this large).
There's quite a lot of mapping activity in Bulgaria at the moment, so local mappers will discover it - maybe not immediately, but eventually.
Even having "unexpected" tagging in OSM is useful as it draws people's attention to things that might need an on-the-ground survey.