@clegeard yes, other people have reported that, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/the-osm-standard-tile-layer-looks-wrong-white-lines-abusive-comments-etc/111583/185 . Please mention in that thread that the CDN is also showing incorrect tiles for you in that location.

Thanks - some other changes by @noun%20allaoua also look like a problem - are you going to fix those too?
(just checking before I do)

Thanks. About the segregated cycleway vs footpath routing, that's an excellent point - I bet there are other sections although the way through Barry / Cardiff that could probably do to be moved from one to the other.

Thanks!

I'd agree with the radio reports and the " at junction 47 (Allerton Park)" in the gov.uk press release (it is "at Allerton Park"). I'm not convinced the junction itself has a name though, especially not "Allerton Park Interchange", which a SABRE mapper renamed it to. For now I've removed that name from the roundabout roads and added "name:signed=no" to the junctions themselves, so that no-one is confused by directions that don't match non-existing on-road signage.

Re the A59 junction "Whole interchange needs updating to June 2022 upgrade, including traffic signals, additional lanes, 50mph speed limit", I've moved the fixme to a particularly problematic section at the southwest. Still needs adding, I'd struggle to do from do from memory - I always concentrate on getting in the right lane and allowing people who have got in the wrong lane to move across!

Fantasy mapping removed. See changeset/151534256

What was the source of the name here?

What was the source of the name here?

What was the source of the name on node/1561127/history ?

What was the source of the name on node/1561127/history ?

Source is local knowledge and driving up the A1M yesterday.

See osm.org/user_blocks/16066 .

See osm.org/user_blocks/16066 .

Thanks for adding the extra crossings. I've added them to the Wales Coast Path as well so that doesn't have gaps there:
relation/3285170#map=18/51.39883/-3.27742
Do you know how people are supposed to get across the road here:
relation/3285170#map=18/51.40884/-3.25143
Cheers,
Andy

No - it was definitely a multipolygon: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1LEQ .
Also, what does Lidar have to do with rendering OSM data? You might use Lidar as an imagery source, but that is it.

Hello,
Here you've deleted a multipolygon relation and replaced it with a single way way/1283786411 . What was the reason that you did that?
Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)

Just to add to the confusion, there's also "memorial:type"...

Thanks!

Thanks