OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
137576451

In addition, this changeset is merely "Upgraded old tags" and is clearly just a mechanical edit to the unclear tags chosen by this "vote".
osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct was not followed. If it had been then the users of the data changed here (including the iD editor!) would have been aware. Because it was done "in secret", they were not.

137576451

To be clear, 20 people thought that that proposal was a good idea. Compared to the number that edited OSM in the last 24 hours, that's 0.37% - it's an insignificant proportion.
To add to that, _none_ of the proponents of the tag were able to address the issues raised during the voting - their replies simply showed that the did not understand how these objects have historically been tagged in OSM.

129272714

Thanks - I'm guessing iD perhaps did it by accident?

129272714

s/use/remove/

129272714

Did you deliberately use some of the tagging for the lifeboat station here? Data consumers did use it: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=lifeboat_station#projects .

137576451

This edit resulted in data consumers being unable to usefully use this data. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-November/030928.html .

144607352

It's clear this is a bridge based on Bing imagery

114529935

Hello ashapancake, unfortunately we can't use Google as a source, as Google's ToS don't allow us to. We'll have to revert and redact way/1008911663 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

138701339

Привіт! Я повернувся way/4440279 до версії, у якій було «old_name:ru». Можливо, на ньому більше не використовується name:ru (хоча жоден із редакторів https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/4440279 цього не зробив, лише коментарі на кшталт «оновлені дані») .

138701339

Hello - I've reverted way/4440279 back to a version that had "old_name:ru" in it. It may be that there's no name:ru used on it any more (although none of the editors at https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/4440279 have made the case, just comments such as "updated data").

144264047

@Barroszt I agree with @muchichka_s . Your previous block was only revoked subject to you NOT making edits like this, hence osm.org/user_blocks/15429 .

144518848

Hello,
There's currently a gap in NCN45 just outside Telford's Warehouse: relation/22602#map=19/53.19308/-2.89906 . Presumably if coming from the southeast you'd turn right and then left, before cycling north?

144479477

Hello, I've filled in the gap in NCN82 at way/1227471059 - do you know if there is a kerb there?

144525353

osm.org/user_blocks/15425

143047584

I don't think your change here makes any sense at all - the previous edit was just fantasy mapping. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/potentially-problematic-edits-in-lottstetten/106514

142989288

C'mon - please engage your brain when making edits like this. Did you really think this was valid data?

143611566

C'mon - please engage your brain when making edits like this. Did you really think this was valid data?

144385572

Some of this "redrawing" is likely incomplete.

69921279

سلام،
متأسفانه، ما می توانیم از Google Earth برای ردیابی استفاده کنیم. شرایط خدمات را در osm.wiki/Google ببینید. ما باید این تغییرات را برگردانیم و اصلاح کنیم،
با احترام،
اندی تاونسند، به نمایندگی از گروه کاری داده OSM.

69921279

Hello,
Unfortunately, we can use Google Earth to trace from. See the terms of service at osm.wiki/Google . We'll need to revert and redact these changes,
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.