Hi, i removed this after copying any tags which differed the way I created a whole 14 minutes before you. BTW I think resolution of SwissSurface is superior in this case. I also changed fortification_type to castrum. Jerry aka SK53

Hi Dud, I don't think landuse=retail is appropriate for the Pottery. The house and business are owned by people I've known all my life, and it's always been a private house and garden, historically with much of the ground floor dedicated to craft workshops and only one room for sales. I think the shop is only opened occassionally these days (the owners are 7-8 years older than me) : at least it wasnt last time I visited 5 years ago.

I think my original tagging of shop=craft looks wrong now (described as craft supplies) : not sure of most appropriate tag, but given customer base is largely tourists, perhaps shop=gift, although the shop_1=art is not wrong either.

Wish I could get to Wales these days!

Jerry

Yeah, I'd agree it's a marginal call, but it appears to be in the address for the Station Master's House which is unlikely for a locality.

I moved the node closer to where OSGB have it (I.e. near the pub & station). I'd have thought 100 years or so there would have been a population in tens (pub, farm with workers, railway, quarry, lime kilns etc.).

This is a well-known place-name relative to others such as Batty Moss or Gauber Limekiln Pasture. The other place I associate it with is the T-junction

Why do you think way/1255759628 is allotments? It would be a very strange location & looks nothing like allotments on aerial imagery.

This, and numerous other polygons mapped hereabouts is a barrier=hedge not landuse=forest. If you don't know what a wooded area is please use natural=wood: apart from Newborough Warren most woodland on Anglesey is deciduous broadleaved semi-natural woodland, not forests.

Thanks,

Jerry aka SK53

Thanks for adding the prayer rooms.

Do you know if they are used separately by men & women? I know I've heard male voices from the room on the S on Fridays. Also I think there are other rooms as part of the multifaith centre which also need to be mapped.

I suspect some of the tags on public footpaths should be permissive and not yes (it is a right which can be withdrawn by the NT not one granted by law). I'm a bit out-of-the loop with what the current standards are for NT.

Years ago when Curly Carver was warden there were some issues about which paths horses could use (Broad Ride in the Thicket was one). I think I did map the broader rides on the part of the common near the cricket ground as bridleways.

Either way being explicit about whether riders are permitted or not is definitely a good thing in an area with so many active riders.

Jerry aka SK53

I think the summit is better tagged as man_made=survey_point + historic=memorial + memorial=plaque. The actual war memorial is the area donated to the National Trust, which might be quite hard to identify if not in the NT open data. Compare with the WWI memorials to men of Cumberland (Scafell Pike tops) and the members of the Fell & Rock (memorial plaque outlining area on summit of Great Gable). The latter is very we.l documented by the FRCC themselves. Werneth Low Country Park in Hyde is, I believe, similar, but in that case there is a large obelisk acting as a monument on its own.

Yes, No entry except buses sign. Have updated.

That was probably some variant tagging on use at the time. I suspect it means motor_vehicle=no as well. I will need to check ifbI have a photo

Please do not unsubscribe from this conversation.

If you fail to discuss this all these edits may be reverted. Consider that OSM is nearly 20 years old, and infrastructure like the Channel Tunnel will have received attention over many years to make sure it is compatible with various routing services. It is therefore unlikely that existing tagging was very far wrong.

I'm concerned that your changes will break numerous downstream applications which rely on OSM data for routing. This is why such changes need to be discussed.

Jerry aka SK53

Yes, well caught : site_tree_no, sitename & tree_type should not be there. The ncc_tree_code is not necessarily a "ref" in OSM terms (it is not the same as the markers on the trees) and is there to allow checks for new trees etc.

There is a danger that you break some data with this approach and particularly so with values of addr:place which should be used in a separate way from addr:suburb etc. Changing an addr:place to addr:suburb in my view will change the semantics. (Further, the actual semantics of addr:suburb have changed over time so that you may be obscuring such differences).

You really need to document the approach you are using and discuss it on talk-gb. I take it that you have some lists of inconsistencies: I think sharing these would be generally valuable.

Jerry aka SK53

Can you explain what "communising ..." means?

Please don't remove school names. name=* tags are far more useful than having them in addr:housename. If you don't like duplication then remove addr:housename, as it can be trivially re-created.

The appropriate tag is leisure=garden access=private. NOT landuse=grass.

@GPSMAP67: your comment about @trigpoint is inappropriate.

I presume this will be reverted by DWG

Definitely not solar pv. A conservatory. Will wait until DWG have tidied up recent changesets.

Most of them are & have been for many years at least at a decent club standard.

Oh, nice!

Has this been discussed anywhere? I don't see a wiki page & the tag has limited historical use mainly in Norway.

I think re-tagging is probably premature, when most people would expect them to be called hillforts (which is well-established even if it doesn't capture current nuances of archaelogical practice.

Jerry