Yes, obviously replaced between 2020 (Bing Srreetside) and that imagery date. Have removed fixed and put in a start date.

Any information about the path you marked as abandoned (way/1360384412)? I walked this in 2014 and it's clearly visible on aerial imagery.

Presumably an earlier version was deleted, because it was definitely on my Garmin 15.5 years ago.

Finally catching up: possibly! The notion of the tag is to delineate a plant community not the dominant_taxon key, where "Picea" would be an appropriate value.

This was very much a bit of experimental tagging trying to find relatively simple tags for woodland plant communities. Subsequently I've used the dominant_taxon key more as it is easier to verify, but it only tangentially implies the community

Jerry

Fixed a few so far: road alignments need a lot of tidying in this area. Will do rest in a sensible editor

Quick use of the measurement panel in iD suggests 10 metres is a more reasonable value, although the tree crowns are not uniformly round. It's worth binning values (e.g. using R) with this sort of data to find obvious outliers (Stereo first noticed peculiar values with Belfast tree open data. We know that usually there's an error rate with cadastral tree data, with perhaps 5% of records with one or more fields with incorrect data: species errors are common; trees which have gone very common;height, girth and spread values I've not checked in as much detail for reasons of practicality).

Hi,

No these look OK. Each group of modules is arranged as 4 rows of 10, so module count of 40 is correct. The idea of mapping each group separately is that it makes it much easier if one wants to convert them to areas.

At present a useful way of checking module counts is to draw lines along each axis and use the measurement tool to see how long they are. Most modules installed these days are 1.6 by 1 m, so look for multiples of these (in this case, each group is roughly 16 by 4 m). Older ones were 1.6 by 0.8 or 0.9 m, but new larger ones will screw up these rules of thumb. I use measurement when the actual count is difficult to obtain from aerial imagery (here the 10 columns are visible, but the 4 rows aren't).

When I did this mapping solar panels were not that easy to spot in London. I had a target of achieving 50% of the numbers present in the FIT data. Since then I've raised my game and managed over 95% for Wales. It does depend a lot on imagery quality, and it looks as though good quality imagery may become scarce in. OSM editors.

Regards,

Jerry

Any particular reason why you changed the Zion Methodist Church, Lees from a way to a node?

You have used the wrong wikidatabitems on the station nodes (town not station).

Hi Dave, Not sure why I missed the addr:city. Not sure about addr:suburb as "Clifton" is no longer part of the postal address & addr:suburb seems to be doing several things : marking actual suburb as part of the address, adding village name when posy town is not local, e.g. I think both North and South Clifton would be addr:suburb=N|S Clifton, addr:city=Newark.

I wasn't kern on thus tagging when it was introduced, and seeing a fair few addr:suburb=Clifton has made me more uneasy.

Jerry

PS. I'll try & find a road name for this one too.

Hi Bernard,

I'd appreciate it if you can avoid editing in this area until Wednesday. The roads around here are a mess and I'm trying to correct them as I can. However, I only have Vespucci with me, and a limited Internet connection so corrections can cause awkward conflicts which I find difficult to resolve on a phone.

I'm just off to investigate the mysterious library.

Thanks, Jerry

Nottingham Post article on The Waterfront closure https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/nottingham-news/future-prime-nottingham-pub-suddenly-9720103