Your changeset message is false: you changed some roads from service roads to residential roads.

This changeset also split ways that are administrative boundaries and sidewalks, what is even the point of doing that?

And if you need to make changes to the street it's more work if they are split for no reason.

why do you do this?

The ESRI imagery seems to have the new updates if you don't zoom in too far, that was enough for me to do some improvements. Take a look and see what you think.

Assiniboine forest no longer shows up as green on the default (non-editing) view of osm as a result of this. That seems unexpected.

Thanks. I've combined your trace screnshot with a local visit to add a service road that goes arounds th construction area. It looks to be permanant construction so this should be how this area will look going forward.

It's only temporarily closed for changes. We need some sort of tag for temporary closure, and/or a tag that reminds us to check back in 6 months or a year when it should be re-opened.

Why did you split this street? What does it help?

Where you added service roads here is actually a fenced off construction site, it's been like that for a couple months. It looks like they are building a building. So I don't think there are going to be roads here anymore even though relatively recent imagery will show this as a parking lot. Do you have any data saying otherwise?

What source are you using for Justin Swadel Drive, Sawanna Point, etc the streets that are east of Ruth Cross/Northridge Road? The city only has the streets west of there, and I can't find any source for Sawanna Point etc.

what data set are you using at geo.ca?

Proposed seems like the wrong tag, it's physically there, you can see it in the imagery.

You've made two mistakes in this.
I checked way/1445226454 a couple of times after your edit, it still had barricades at both ends. It is not an open cycleway, it is still under construction.

way/1443895811 does not extend as far as the sidewalk and road (Frontier Trail) beside it, there is a perpendicular street or alley there that it hits before it ever even gets that far. I went out and gps recorded this cycle path and accurately mapped it. It is very frustrating to find that you have taken my correct work and made it incorrect. It is further frustrating that I've brought up this issue with you multiple times and you keep doing it! Stop!!! Be more careful. Other people have edited the map with great care. Don't just come along and ruin all of their accurate hard work.

Why did you change these two paths?
way/1389473613
way/1389473614
I put them on the map based on actual gps data, you moved them to the wrong location. The source of your changeset has "gps" in it, but how are you using a gps? When I use gps I upload a gpx file and edit based on that and my changesets show that I used a gpx file, but your changeset does not say that you used a gpx upload.

Again, let me repeat this again, it is very frustrating to expend a lot of effort to go out and get accurate gps tracks and edit the map correctly, only to find that you have come along and moved things to wrong positions in giant changesets destroying all that hard work others have put in. Please stop doing that!

You moved administrative boundaries in this. Do you actually know that they were at the wrong coords? If so what is your data source for that?

That does not seem correct, street signs (for labelling exists) refer to the south perimeter as "trans canada".

Hi, I reverted this in changeset/174060044

I was just at this location a couple of hours ago, the map data before this revision was correct. This is an active construction project that just finished these roads in the last couple of days, unless your sources are that recent they are out of date. Even looking at the link you provided you can see the parts that are marked complete are more closely matched by the map data before this change.

Nice! I've been slowly working on getting all of the city of wpg parks added and named.

Did you notice that the esri images got updated for winnipeg? Thought you might be interested to know!