Old Market Square is considered a park according to the city if you search for it at https://parkmaps.winnipeg.ca/

It's been three months and you still haven't provided a source, can you please get back to us?

Thanks for following up!

I noticed that if you tag each of the areas in the multipolygon as a forest it goes back to green. I also noticed that we don't have an area for the Assinboine Forest as a park (it is a city of wpg park), but if that is also a multipolygon then that might not fix the green color issue.

I don't know why. I just noticed the color change and found this changeset caused it.

I also tried messaging you. No response so I'm going to revert these 3 edits.

I don't think these streets exist. I was here last week, pretty sure they weren't constructed in the middle of Winnipeg winter.

I visited the park but it's impossible to tell what the paths look like with the snow. But there definitely is a playground to the east of the pool. I did find the last change to this park before yours changeset/165045419 8 months ago and it used a gpx data file. I also found my strava activity from april and it agrees with that change from 8 months ago.

Okay, so if I was exploring the area on my bike I should not turn down this road and just keep going?

Is the street access private?

Thanks for you reply. I think it can wait until one of us is able to visit the park in person to confirm.

Did you visit this park this year? I did and my memory is that the paths had changed quite recently and that what was on osm before this changeset was accurate and the aerial imagery was out of date.

So you removed oneway=yes from a lot of roundabouts? Can you put that in the comment? Why did you do that? Is that not the style? Aren't these roundabouts oneway?

Thanks for the additional information about how layer tags work.

So in this case we have roads that are below ground level, roads that are above them and also above ground level, and then roads outside of that area that are at ground level. Saying that these roads on top are layer 0, the same as the roads next to them that are lower at ground level feels weird. Is there a better way to tag it?

Why? Whats the point of dividing this?

I think the layer tags were correct before so I undid this.

I think these ways were already tagged correctly, so I undid this edit.

oneway=no is correct for this street, why remove it?

Again, your comment is false. You changed the type and access of roads only.

You didn't even divide any streets in this changeset. The only change you made was to the access of a road. So your summary comment is completely false! Please do not do that!