Overtagging. It's not needed and only about a third of the address in the area had it anyway.

Now at 10 bn nodes!

If this is now a B road what's the number?

Live demonstration of changes made: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4G99ROu9CM

There it is!

Moved to correction location on changeset #123464025.

Hi Colin,

That's fine and makes sense. I just wanted to check that was the intention. Thanks for confirming.

Regards,
Paul

I assume this is intentionally the same as the South Yorkshire relation?

relation/88078

No trace seems to exist on any public domain mapping I can find. If you know otherwise, even if it's a name only in local use and not signed anywhere, please let me know.

Kudos on a nice changeset number.

It's actually rather easy to "do islands" in the iD editor: simply select the lake and the island then select Merge and it will create a multipolygon with the correct roles (inner and outer).

I have done this for you on changeset #119975917.

Thanks for spotting this. I've managed to track down the source so I'll be sure to sanitise for non-breaking spaces from now on.

Hi,

Thanks for fixing the otherwise invisible non-breaking spaces in the postcodes I recently added. I know now to check for these characters and I've sanitised my upcoming changes accordingly.

Regards,
_Paul_

Hi John,
Looks like I started a changeset while you had this one open. As such, it might look like I reverted a couple of your changes around Gunthwaite but this was not intentional.
Regards,
_Paul_

Intended changeset comment:

Penistone: Bridge Street house numbering.

Changeset comment should have been: "NR11/NR12/NR13: Post box/defibrillator box survey."

1 bn ways!

The Purple Line no longer goes to Meadowhall.

Resolved on changeset #108696877.

It's no problem at all. All comments and discussion are most welcome!