Good, that makes perfect sense, like this changeset is private. Also regarding Telegram, might be worth getting out of the group then, if you don't reply there.

dont see the point of having that there, especially when you dont reply on Telegram group. But you are free to do as you wish.

o que é que não existe?

That argument about single trees being mapped as landuse its ridiculous. If you have detailed data why would you make it generic? It's the other way around, not the way you suggested.

On the swamps, what i see is wetland, which can be seasonal as you can read on the wiki. natural=wetland

About the "fictional" elements, you should have wrote that in the changeset where you deleted thousands of elements at once. SEO spamming, as i mentioned, if you do not agree with certain elements, you edit them and mentioned that in the changeset comment, not just blatantly delete >500 elements.

About the UI, im sure you are aware you can make or use other map layouts. Which you can cartographically represent only certain elements. Following your mindset we should delete indoor mapping, because its not rendered.

About your multiple account, which i can't verify since i cannot guess who you are as you don't mention other usernames. i have a transparent policy. i don't hide under different alias.

Regarding the Map Masters as you can see its not my team, but HERE. And to be honest i don't see the relevant fact of that being mentioned in this discussion as you clearly deleted thousands of elements, when in your point of view you dont agree with some. That's not how we behave on OSM.

Also, can you pinpoint where there's elements without tags?

Hi,

Feel free to escalate to DWG.

I dont see any mentiond of micromapping being unwanted as you state. osm.wiki/Micromapping
Following that logic we should delete all micromapping and indoor mapping because the areas around it arent mapped at that level of detail. That makes no sense.

Regarding my revert, feel free to fix, not just delete the data like you did before.
From checking your profile, i can see that 20% of your edits are deletions, which im quite sure if i inspect (judging by the two changesets i reverted) that are incorrect deletions.

The question is not my revert, the question is your changeset that deleted, which shouldnt be deleted in the first place. Thats the reason for this mess, not my revert. Feel free to edit and tagging.

Regarding you accusation of OzFlor being a member of my Map Masters Portugal, i do not own any team.

You are giving justification for 10 elements, but you deleted over 1000 elements on both changesets. Both of them have been reverted. Do not delete elements

Hi, i assume you read the guidelines, you shouldnt delete elements. About the public access to certain elements, you can add the tag access, not simply remove them from the map like you did.
The data has been restored

novamente, você eliminou informação sem motivo aparente. edição revertida

hello, why did you delete all this data? you shouldnt delete data, unless it cease existence.
Im waiting for a reply, before reverting your edit

No it's not. As you can see on the wiki it's been submitted in 2007 and rejected

As I mentioned that tag does not exist. Status: Abandoned (inactive) for further information check osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Hazard_warning

It's not a approved tag, delete it. It's useless to come up with tags that aren't displayed. There's a sign on each of those roads, therefore drivers will be aware of it. In alternative add the traffic sign of rockfall. Do not invent tags that don't exist as its pointless. In the way of the road you can add the tag "note=the text you invented in that tag"

hi, why did you add the tag hazard=dangerous_road

?

isto não é uma escola, é um pavilhão. será revertido.

That app doesn't render that element. Use OSMand instead

reverted

reverted

fix it. thats not the name of it

reverted