qual o motivo para a alteração, quando a outra etiqueta é mais condizente com a realidade?

Revertido. Como mencionei, não há living streets em portugal. Não altere a linha de costa que é a oficial

Olá Pedro. Edição revertida. Em Portugal não há living street. Por favor leia as regras e as guidelines antes de editar

Correção. Revertida, é uma rua residencial e não não classificada

Olá Pedro. Edição revertida. Em Portugal não há living street

are you sure theres a bathroom there?

Incorrect. The museum went bankrupt in 2015 as you can see on this news site https://www.dnoticias.pt/hemeroteca/497600-madeira-story-centre-encerra-portas-no-proximo-dia-13-de-fevereiro-BHDN497600 In late 2015 it reopened as a restaurant and shop only but kept its name. Source https://www.dnoticias.pt/impressa/hemeroteca/diario-de-noticias/555875-story-centre-reabre-com-loja-e-restaurante-PKDN555875

Please do not add data that's inaccurate and based on unreliable third party and unauthorized import to OSM. Especially when its a conflict of interest. The museum no longer exists for four years, the fact someone lists it on a website does not means it exists.
The name of Jardim Municipal do Funchal, is a example where the name was fetched from Trip Advisor (which is clearly wrong).

Then you shouldn't have deleted the one it was on the database. But add the alternative one. I fixed it and added the alternative names.

reverted

Exacto. Imprecisões. O problema aqui está na edição do utilizador que removeu um dos nomes. Vou fazer revert à edição que mudou o nome.

it never had that name. reverted

@topolusitania a igreja não se chama Igreja de Santa Maria Maior. Petence é à paróquia de Santa Maria Maior. a edição do utilizador removeu o nome correto "Igreja do Socorro" e substituiu por este incorreto. Mesmo que se admita o nome que colocou, nunca deveria ter removido o outro. Este utilizador tem mudado nomes sem os fundamentar, quando já solicitei que os fundamente. Exemplo o Jardim Municipal do Funchal, que colocou como sendo "Jardim de São Francisco", quando não se chama assim, nem nunca teve esse nome. Aguardo que o utilizador fundamente, caso contrário as edições serão revertidas.

i will give you more 24 hours to reply and justify the changesets i questioned three days ago. If no reply, i will have to revert your edits

again, asking you why did you add this? this was shut down in 2015.

why did you change the name?

Again, why did you change the name?

hello, you change this name based on?

Its the second time you indirectly question my impartiality. Its not my Telegram group, its OSM Portugal and allow me to disagree with you as it was probably the best thing that happened in the last year regarding our portuguese community, to share, organize and discuss OSM related matters. It is not a closed source channel as anyone can join. And again, you keep pointing to different directions than the source of all this discussion, the two changesets that deleted 1100 elements in the map. And this will be the last time you will hear from me, as i'm not wasting any more of my time with this irrational, non-objective and lack of respect for OSM guidelines.

You are free to search for what I done over the years, I don't hide behind alias like you do. About the edits, I already told you several times to edit. Not delete. You keep ignoring that and pushing irrational arguments. Your ovrrmspping argument is pointless. Now have fun o your irrational talk because I'm not here to someone hiding being a nickname, questioning my integrity and my efforts over the years for OSM.
have fun and feel free to reply on Telegram instead of ignoring.

It's written on the wiki, so it's not like a secret like you make it look like. I see you don't reply on Telegram, but you are reading, funny. Again as I said, give him time to fix. The first thing is the mass deletion you done. That's not how to proceed.