Hmm, i see that https://www.themontclairgardens.com points to a different location not too far away with a different address. 🤔Two apartment complexes with the same name in the same town?

Ah, i see you already mapped the hydrant inside in the middle. osmcha didn't show that.
Although, should those 2 pillars be mapped separately or are they integral part of the hydrant?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126351993

NYC also has some effort to map sidewalks. We have quite a few people on osmus slack doing it. You are welcome to join to discuss these things and coordinate. Also there're map tasking manager projects such as https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/152 and https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/224 and I think more but can't kind it right now.

Hello.
Are all 3 buildings here have the same street address?

This is SEO spam, you damaged correct building tags and added invalid OSM tags.
This edit was reverted in full.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126211042

This is SEO spam, you damaged correct building tags and added invalid OSM tags.
This edit was reverted in full.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126165466

This is SEO spam, you damaged correct building tags, added invalid OSM tags and damaged Park Place street.
This edit was reverted in full.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126165408

Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are you mapping here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126394398

Looking at that github repo, it seems like for now it's still only a proposed way of mapping, not exactly the defacto spec, so perhaps just be aware of it, but don't necessarily retag every single intersection that way?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126374881

Are those bollards or fire hydrant?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126351993

Hello.
Could you please explain why did you add building:part=yes here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126348749

Hello.
You added building:part=yes to a bunch of buildings. However, I do not see any other parts of those buildings or the parent building way. Could you please elaborate on this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126348319

Hello.
When mapping features that supposed to have right angles, after you draw them, you can right-click on them and select "make square" (shortcut key Q). That will make your mapping more accurate to the real world and look neater. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126347804

Hello.
Could you please write more descriptive changeset comments? "Brooklyn" doesn't help other mappers understand what exactly you are mapping. Please see this article for more detailed explanation: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126344829

Hello.
Could you please write more descriptive changeset comments? "Brooklyn" doesn't help other mappers understand what exactly you are mapping. Please see this article for more detailed explanation: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments 👍

Hello.
Generally, around NYC it's better to use Bing imagery instead of Mapbox since Bing is more up-to-date and better aligned to the actual gps coordinates.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126310694

Hello.
Those small "antenna" segments between sidewalk and crosswalk are still considered sidewalk so it's ok to tag them as such.. 🙂👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126310584

What are you trying to accomplish with your overpass query?

What kind of query are you using? what exactly do you want to export? From what I see all the water features in this area are already properly mapped. But in addition to this, you tagged this feature as multipolygon even though it's not a relation nor a multipolygon..
I'm thinking this should be reverted

Hello.
If I'm not mistaken, maxheight tag should be only on the relevant sections where it applies, ie just around the overpass, not a segment going large distance back.
Or is that no longer the standard?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126214186