OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
125250981

πŸ”΅πŸ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125250981

125231788

Hello.
Could you please elaborate what's the purpose of creating relation/14486564?
In relation/14486566, wouldn't it make sense to expand "GCT" in the name tag?(and if necessary add short_name tag?)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125231788

125213743

Hello.
Please note that "url=" is not a valid tag. What you want is "website=". πŸ‘

125213117

Hello.
In relation/14484596, it seems like alt_name= is more appropriate as operator= ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125213117

125208729

What you could do is draw an alignment circle, snap relevant nodes to it and then delete that alignment circle. πŸ˜‰
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125208729

125156912

πŸ‘
But please don't map steps along their width the way I've seen elsewhere in the area. That's also incorrect.

125156912

But that is misleading and mistaging, especially when it comes to wheelchair or other accessible routing. Not every square millimeter of walkable surface needs to be covered by some sort of area.

125164310

Hello.
Wouldn't a gift shop be a better tag for this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125164310

125156912

Hello.
It appears that you tagged steps as pedestrian area. That seems very wrong.. Could you please elaborate on this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125156912

125155456

Hello.
Unless a bench is extremely long, generally it's best to represent them with just a simple node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125155456

125129347

Then should they be tagged as picnic tables or the restaurant as having outdoor seating?

125129347

Hello.
Are those actually publicly accessible picnic tables or outdoor-dining tables from the nearby resturant?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125129347

125120086

Hello.
When you are splitting ways to include maxheight tag, please try to split it as close as possible to the actual location of where the height is restricted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125120086

125111655

Hello.
Where is that information from?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125111655

125107892

That's not normal.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125107892

125092619

reverted in 125132572
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125092619

125090990

reverted in 125132572
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125090990

125066724

Hello.
Could you please explain why did you tag way/1087247033 as layer=-1, implying that it is underground?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125066724

125066011

Hello.
Why did you tag one of these pools as layer=-1, implying it is under ground?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125066011

125033541

Every single POI for which you edited phone number is in different formatπŸ˜…
It would be great if it was consistent as documented in phone=*#Usage
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125033541