Hello.
You tagged one of the buildings here as a storage tank. Is that accurate? From the satellite imagery it appears to be a regular building..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122776193

Hello.
When mapping features, please try not attach/glue/snap unrelated features to each other unless they are actually attached. That makes it harder in the future to edit them. In this case there's no need for these 2 bike racks to be attached to the neighborhood area polygon. 🙂
It might be a little bit more hassle when editing, but something to look out for. 👍
I fixed it up for you.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122776038

Hello.
You added a footway here with "layer=-1" implying that it is underground. Is that correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122764046

There are no tags for wikimedia, but you are welcome to link to the correct wikidata Q reference number as documented in wikidata=*

When linking to wikipedia articles it should be just "wikipedia=language:page title", not the whole https:// url. I fixed it up for you. 👍🙂
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122762526

Hello.
What do you mean by these ref tags?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122758472

1) I have no control how this app tags things as closed.
2) I have already updated this node with relevant information.
3) Go ahead and report me and revert this. I love me some edits wars.

There's no need to delete it since it's there. However, it shouldn't have a name which doesn't exist.

You might be misunderstanding that tag. It is intended to be used with building=construction, highway=construction, landuse=construction or railway=construction to give more specific information about that object.
Based on what I see it's not intended for POIs.

Since this is not its actual name and osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions this doesn't seem like a proper way to tag this feature. At most it could be considered "loc_name", but even then it's just a name that you came up with and not something referred as by others. And that's still a description of the feature and not as much of a name. But just became a feature doesn't have name doesn't mean it can't be mapped, so it's fine for it to be nameless.
You could also consider tagging it as "attraction=maze" + "maze=labyrinth", but these are not officially agreed tags.

I don't read German so I can't tell, but is that an accepted and documented tag or just some terminology they are playing around with?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122689589

Hello.
Is "Richmond County Country Club" actually the name of this pool or is this just where it is located and the pool itself doesn't have a name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122669981

Hello.
What is the source of those cad pdfs?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122652680

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change access tag from "customers" to "unknown"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122687836

There are a number of other prefixes that might be of use to you in the future edits osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

You could use opening_date= tag opening_date=*
But if you don't know the opening date, perhaps don't map it and instead leave OSM note in that location with relevant details.

Hello.
For node/9834318940 "amenity=restaurant" + "building=construction" combination doesn't make sense.
Could you please elaborate what are you trying to map here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122637416

Hello.
Is "outdoor pattern" the official name of this feature or something you came up with?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122637375

You can read more about this tag at disused=* 👍

Hello.
"amenity:disused=true" is not a correct way to tag closed businesses.
In the case of Fusco "amenity=resturant" should be changed to "disused:amenity=resturant".
In the case of Spa Here "shop=beauty" should be changed to "disused:shop=beauty".
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122635881

If you have time and know-how and what needs to be "fixed" is small enough, it's best to fix it yourself on the spot. Otherwise such fixme tag could be hanging there for years.🙂
Or obviously you are welcome to add the missing data at a later point when you have time.
StreetComplete is primarily for "data enrichment", ie adding missing tags to already mapped features...It's not really intended to be a fully-featured editor like Vespucci or iD on desktop.

But in this specific case in my opinion that ramp should be mapped separately and stairs' tag updated to be "separate". You can see somewhat similar situation in an example here ramp=*