OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
121786682

Hello.
Satellite and streetside imagery doesn't show any traffic lights on node/597414727, yet you mapped it as such. Could you please elaborate on that change?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121786682

121784592

Hello.
Looking at satellite and streetside imagery for node/452386215, it doesn't look like there are any traffic lights there. How come you mapped it as such?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121784592

121787565

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? Look at the satellite imagery, it doesn't look there's any traffic lights here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121787565

121780341

Hello.
I'm not sure this tag is accurate here.
This is a public playground. If I remember correctly it's not connected to the school.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121780341

121695091

You are explicitly NOT allowed to use Google Streetview to generate data for OSM. Please see osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?
As such this edit is going to be reverted.

113621213

I was waiting at a bus stop on ocean ave just south of ave H and I think I saw sharrows on both sides of the road? They were pretty worn out from traffic๐Ÿค” But I could've been mistaken with some other random road paint there so I'll defer to your decision.

121763129

Hello.
Your updated road shape doesn't match any of the available satellite imagery. Could you please elaborate on this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121763129

121753690

Hello.
Do you know the name of this business?
Additionally, phone number you entered is in invalid format. Please see this article that documents the correct way: phone=*#Usage
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121753690

121744909

This is similar to the other edit, bicycle=unknown is an invalid tag...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121744909

121744612

Hello.
"bicycle=unknown" is not a valid tag. If a situation is unknown then you shouldn't tag it. You can see it explicitly mentioned on bicycle=*
I think this edit should be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121744612

121740324

Why is way/1065359518 so zigzagy? Is that a mistake?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121740324

121727800

Hello.
Why did you delete valid address tags?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121727800

121695091

Hello uplander
What is the source of this edit? Where is this data coming from?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121695091

121674880

In changeset/121646013 you incorrectly changed building address from 31-43 to 31-45 and placed "London Boutique" POI on a wrong building.
I fixed that.
In this changeset you again moved "London Boutique" which has address of 31-45 over building with address of 31-47.
Once again I fixed that.
Prince Tea House is 31-47 and its node is over building with address of 31-47.
London Boutique is 31-45 and its node is over building with address of 31-45.
Everything I said is recorded in the history of these objects.

121690391

Your edit is not exactly correct here.
You made existing tagged node part of the new solar panel shape, in essence you mapped the same feature twice, and that goes against the concept of osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

A better approach would be to draw a shape of a solar panel, then shift-select existing solar panel node, right-click with both of them selected and select Merge(shortcut key C.) That way all the tags will get transferred to the new shape and old node cleaned up. ๐Ÿ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121690391

121685719

Fire hydrant in the middle of a road?๐Ÿคจ
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121685719

121685414

Hello.
Rather than deleting old POI node and creating a new one, it's better to update old node with the new information. That way you are preserving history of that object and making it possible to refer to if need arises.

If a business is gone and that location is vacant, you can use delete biz-specific info and leave only an address node. However, the best approach would be to use lifecycle prefixes as documented in osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix ๐Ÿ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121685414

121678287

Hello uplander.
What is the purpose of moving these POIs?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121678287

121674880

Hello uplander.
Why did you move this business on top of a building with a different address?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121674880

121668524

Hello.
As documented in osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions name should not have descriptive information(in this case "exit only" part.) As such I updated that feature with the correct way of handling exit-only entrances.
Regarding the Chinese restaurant, as documented in phone=* phone numbers should be written out in full, with multiple numbers separated with ;
I corrected that tag for you. ๐Ÿ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121668524