Hello.
You already mapped this business in changeset/120019791. Mapping it twice goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element. Therefore this edit is going to be reverted.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120809833

Hello.
There are multiple problems with your edit.
You mapped this business as both, tags on the building and as separate POI node. Doing this goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

You used "description" field for blatantly promotional messaging which goes against description=*

You used facebook page as a website tag instead of contact:facebook.

I fixed it already 😉

Hello.
Settings all roads to "private" implies that nobody is allowed there except for the owner. That is most likely not the case considering their official website has "Visit Us" section.
A more appropriate access tag would be "permissive", meaning anybody is allowed unless they get kicked out.
You can read more about various tags on access=*#List_of_possible_values
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120762821

Hello.
There are 2 issues with your edit.
For one, please try not to abbreviate names, but fully spell them out. Apps and systems can easily figure out how to make a long string shorter if it doesn't fit, but it's much harder to go the other way(for example is St. short for Street or Saint, and other similar ambiguities).
Second issue is Exit name is already mapped in "destination:street=Fort Hamilton Parkway". And the previous destination name is explicitly signed on the highway. You can see it here https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=40.6532~-73.977574&lvl=17&dir=157.394&style=x&v=2&sV=1
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120752469

Hello.
Please do not lie in the changeset comments. You do not know any local resident information.
I know that you make these edits for upland game and you charge people to add POIs to the map!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120745371

Were you in Greenwood today?!
I was there today too and about the same time and same area!😅 We might have walked past each other.

In that case it should be amenity=parking, parking=multi-storey, building=parking.
And is that an actual proper name of that garage? If not then the names should not be used as description. It is explained in more details here: osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Regarding the swimming pool, you can map it as leisure=swimming_pool, location=rooftop
👍

Hello.
With this edit you changed this feature from a building into a parking lot. Based on the satellite imagery it doesn't look like a parking lot. It seems like a multi-level parking garage. Is that accurate?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120724327

Hello.
OSM is about mapping the world now(or recent past). These names were used 400 years ago. It shouldn't be on OSM. You are welcome to add them to OHM though.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120719780

Hello.
gnis:feature_id tag is supposed to be numeric, not name. Also searching GNIS for that name produces no results...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120720624

Yelp, Yahoo and MapQuest are all copyrighted and proprietary sources which are not allowed to be used in OSM. This edit is going to be reverted.
Please read osm.wiki/Copyright
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120684280

What kind of "stuff" did you edit here?
Your edit covers 3 continents over the Atlantic Ocean...

Please take a look at this article osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hello.
As documented in phone=*#Phonewords it is inappropriate to map phone number with words. It should've been expanded into the actual correct numbers. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120679377

How exactly are you doing a better job by outright deleting valid address nodes and creating new ones with wrong information?
How exactly are you doing a better job by leaving snarky, pissy and useless changeset comments that don't help anybody understand what you are mapping. Please read this article to better understand what makes for good comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120671471

This is clearly a 3-story residential building. As such it is wrong to tag it as having 1 level.
Being a residential building and this bar occupying only the first floor, it is wrong to tag the whole building as a bar. You have been advised not to to do it in the past, yet you still do it.
So how exactly are you doing a better job by making outright wrong edits?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120670907

Why did you delete a valid address node?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120670195

Hello.
This church is already mapped as tags on its building, therefore it's not needed to be mapped as a separate node. You can read about this guideline at osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120654772

Also regarding the razed train tracks, consider checking out this article, it talks about it in more details osm.wiki/Demolished_Railway

Not glueing to roads(unless necessary) is a good practice 🙂 but beyond that it's better to map features to what they are in the real world. If there's a school or a park or a construction site or some other clearly defined feature, map them to their actual perimeter which often is demarked with a fence or grass adjacent to sidewalks.🙂👍
Yes, misaligned satellite imagery can be challenging to decide which one is the most accurate. Just do your best guess there. Sometimes turning on gps tracks or streetview layers might be useful to try to estimate which imagery is more aligned.
If you have any questions feel free to ask 👍