Could use https://zlant.github.io/parking-lanes/ to make parking tagging easier.

There's also osm.wiki/Street_parking#Separately_mapped_parking_areas_and_spaces

You can confirm speed limits on https://vzv.nyc/
maxheight=default is a valid tag value maxheight=* I'm not saying it's correct here, but it can be correct. Also nyc gov't has a database ..somewhere..(i don't remember where exactly i saw it) online with bridge/overpass heights.

Please note that a feature's name should not be used as its description.
You already specified that this is sport=softball, therefore it's not necessary to write that in the name= tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147137847

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete the height tag from a building here?

Also when adding tag values, they should always be in the lower case (except for proper names and a few other exceptions).
In this case, it should be building:colour=red, not "Red".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147137206

Hello.
When mapping straight sidewalks there's no need to add intermedia nodes along the way. Ultimately it should be a straight way from curb to curb with only nodes present are intersecting with any other ways.
Also please remember to tag curbs. If you can not tell what kind of curb it is from satellite imagery, you can just tag it as a generic curb, and that will be prompt apps like StreetComplete to fill in the missing details for people who are on the ground and can survey it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147131144

When specifying height or weight or other parameters and you see that StreetComplete highlights a longer than necessary part of a road, it's best to go into "other answers", select "differs along the way" and it'll bring you to a simple UI where you can split/cut a way into smaller pieces.
Doing that will allow you then to tag height or whatever only to sections where it actually applies.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147105160

Similarly here, ref= instead of osm.wiki/Tag:name=, no?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147097610

Rather than name I think this should be ref= tag, don't you think?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147097177

Stairs with surface of fine_gravel? Is that accurate?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147075827

Wouldn't it be cleaner to map this as tags of the road itself?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147040927

Ah.
In StreetComplete when it's asking for opening hours or I think pretty much any other questions, you can tap on "Other Answer" or 3 dots and there should be an option "it doesn't exist". That will properly flag that location as vacant. 👍

Hello.
Why multipolygon relation if it's a single member?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147028226

Are you sure this section belongs to Kissena Corridor Park and not Cunningham Park?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147007433

Hello.
When mapping buildings, please make sure to align their shapes to the baseline, not rooftop, because the position of the rooftop line can change as satellite imagery is taken from different positions in space, but baseline of the building will always remain static. This is especially more pronounced the higher a building is.
In this specific edit you aligned one side of the building 248516693 to its base, but another to its roof. That's obviously not the correct shape.

What I tend to do if I can't see the whole baseline of a building is to try to map it to its rooftop to make sure the overall shape is accurate, and then move and align the whole shape to one or more visible corner. That way both the shape and positioning will be accurate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147007103

Hello.
Please note that opening hours value should be not just a single time when a biz opens, but the actual time range of when it's operational.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147005530

yup.
fixed it.

I see nothing on any available satellite imagery to indicate that there's anything left of those rails to match what you mapped.

If it's a trail, then it should be mapped separately. Not as part of the railway itself.
In this case what's left of the railway is there purely for decoration purposes.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146400642

The segment that you mapped crosses over fences and other objects making it extremely unlikely that there's anything left of that railroad.
You are welcome to map that service road or driveway or access path. But it is not railroad.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146974346

Rather than outright delete this, it probably would've been better to adjust this path's properties to indicate that it's no longer a paved road and a private driveway.