This shape seems...questionable?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139319304

Hello.
Every single tag you added is invalid and doesn't follow OSM requirements.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139279075

Hello.
Please note that the name= field is not supposed to be for description.
You already tagged the way itself as highway=bridleway. No need to duplicate that info into the name field unless that is actually the proper and official name of this path.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139276874

Hello.
Do you have more information about this feature, like address, website, phone number?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139275455

Hello.
In the future please split up your edits into smaller geographic areas to make it easier to review them. 👍

way/972138872 seems to be a dragged node or is that how it actually is?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139250333

Hello.
This street also appears to be 2-way. Are you sure about your changes?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139237147

Hello.
Is this change accurate? Satellite and street imagery from March of this year shows that it's still a 2-way street.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139236579

You call a flea market to ask if they accept bitcoin?🤨
Please do not lie in your changeset comments and write actually valid information.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139230102

Hello.
Why didn't you delete inappropriate litecoin tag as well since this is clearly just a building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139230101

Hello.
Who exactly did you contact if that place haven't been in business for 7-8 years?🤨
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139230100

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag Avenue L as oneway street? That doesn't seem correct...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139248656

The fact that you want me to point out wrong data to you means YOU don't even know what is in that import that you just blindly submitted. If you knew, you'd clearly see corrupted phone numbers, corrupted website addresses.
Just becuase some biz in your import had names in all caps doesn't mean those are actual real names of those biz. If you would've actually verified that data, you'd see that. Additionally, as documented in osm.wiki/Names you supposed to Title Case normalize such biz names.

OSM is not intended to be a replacement for a menu or a catalog of what biz sells. Plus the values that you blindly imported are not only invalid, but also don't follow the guidelines of OSM values.

I used constructive approach with you before you went ahead and imported INVALID data into OSM for the 2nd time, and before you lied that you manually reviewed every single submission and before you lied that you manually submitted this data.

If that was the case, you wouldn't have these changesets on your account: 138592479, 138592481, 138592501, 138592509, 138592537, 138592566, 138592594, 138592771, 138595453, 138595472, 138595531, 138595609, 138595654, 138595786.

Such things don't just happen. You obviously used data-import tool without properly disclosing it.

The value of phone= tag is invalid as documented in phone=*#Usage
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138600471

The values of both wikidata= and wikipedia:en= tags are invalid as documented in wikidata=* and wikipedia=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138600625

Additionally,
"S Grand Blvd" is not an appropriate street name as documented in osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it) and osm.wiki/Abbreviations

Furthermore, the value of service_times= tag is invalid since it doesn't follow the established syntax of that tag as documented in opening_hours=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138690456

"recreation=swimming_pool" is not an appropriate tag combination for this feature.
leisure=swimming_pool documents all the correct tags that are applicable to this feature.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138825367

The value of the charge= tag is incorrect as documented in charge=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138826272

The value of name= in this POI is incorrect.
We have name= and short_name= as documented in short_name=*

I'll repeat here AGAIN since you obviously didn't read the other changeset comment:

phone numbers were in the wrong format or corrupted or mushed together.
websites were in the wrong format. without protocol or just completely wrong.
there were other tags with a ton of stuffed keywords... more like for seo rather than anything useful
many biz names were not normalized.

wtf is this... produce=apples;fruit and tree nuts;peach;pear;raspberry;tree nut;herbs and spices;beef;beef cows;lamb;mutton;sheep;honey;chicken;eggs;turkeys;asparagus;cucumber;eggplant;lettuce;mushrooms;potato;squash;tomato
product=hay;honeybees;horses;agritourism

And you have garbage data like this in too many nodes to allow that to be imported into OSM!