Hello.
You keep creating notes written from the first person. However, somebody looking at these features at some point in the future will have no idea who "I" is.
While what you did is not outright wrong, it's creates confusion and ambiguity. It's much better to write such notes in a neutral tone and with consideration that somebody would be reading this 2, 3, 5, or even 10 years later.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138644088

Hello.
This edit will be reverted in full since it damaged part of the mapped building.
If you want to add your business, please add it as a node.
Additionally, as explicitly documented in description=*#No_advertising, the description should only include neutral and factual information about the object, not advertisements or promotions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138617381

Hello.
In the future please split your changes grouped by each location. That makes it much easier to review them.

osm.wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.4.2#Split_your_uploads_to_areas_of_reasonable_sizes_and_relevance

But looking at access=* "Introductory examples" section seems to describe situations that match cemeteries pretty closely... At least when it comes to publicly accessible cemeteries like Greenwood, Woodlawn, Washington, Montefiore.

If bikes are not allowed that doesn't mean other types of access are "private".

Hello.
When mapping square buildings you can right-click on them and select "Make Square" (shortcut key Q) to make the buildings have right angles.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599733

Not only did you incorrectly grouped buildings, accepted wrong shape, but you also assigned wrong layer tag to the intersecting road! 1190071743
Just because editor complains about intersecting roads and buildings doesn't mean you should just blindly tag one is below the other. It has to be CORRECTLY resolved!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599391

Yet another changeset with bad building shapes and grouping.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599310

Another changeset with inappropriately grouped buildings and ridiculously bad shapes like 1190070405
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599129

Extremely badly mapped buildings here! WTH is 1190070112?!
Why is 1190070097 mapped all the way into the road?!
You can NOT just blindly accept everything that RapiD presents to you and just accept it!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599081

This changeset also has many misaligned buildings and buildings that should've been mapped separately.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599017

This changeset also contains glued buildings and incorrect building shapes.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138598570

In this changeset also buildings have been glued together like 1190063798 when it's actually many separate buildings and many are mapped with highly distorted shapes and alignments.
It is inappropriate to just blindly accept everything that AI detected without proper MANUAL review!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138598481

This changeset also contains many buildings that should've been mapped separately and highly inaccurate shapes.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138598472

In this change you also just blindly accepted what RapiD presented you without actually correcting highly inaccurate building shapes or mapping buildings as separate features.
Please correct this asap.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138598448

Hello.
Just like in the past you once again just blindly accept what AI detected without correcting obvious mistakes. 1190063433, 1190063420, 1190063443, 1190063406 are obviously separate buildings and should be mapped as such.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138598430

I have also found https://linathhazedek.wordpress.com
There they call it "Chevra Linath Hazedek", while your link calls it "Khal Linath Hatzedeck". I don't speak Hebrew so I don't know which one is more appropriate... In the mean time I updated this building to have correct address and other tags.

So did they move to the new location or do they have more than 1 location?

Or was this location incorrectly tagged from the start and they were always just at Clara Street?

This changeset have been reverted in full due to severe data quality problems. Please read osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines before doing any future imports.

changeset/138597728

Hello.
Please link where this import was discussed and documented.

There are severe data quality problems in it.

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? This building is most definitely not on Clara Street and this building's number can't be 109 since buildings to the left and right of it are 132 and 126.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138594849