this invalid edit have been reverted in full

changeset/137855731

Hello.
What kind of tourist attraction is this lighthouse feature?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137611856

Hello.
What is this phone number? https://www.ferraridrivingschool.com/contact/brooklyn-driving-school/ clearly states +1-718-278-6679
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137598341

ya, I was puzzled by such table when I saw one installed here on Brighton Beach. But when I googled teq branding I found that it's actually a sport

Hello.
Please try not to delete nycdoitt:bin= tag.
It records unique building ID which can be referenced in NYC's building database to get metadata about a given building.
If a building is demolished that tag is usually renamed to old_nycdoitt:bin= but still preserved because using the old id we can look up the new one.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137496855

Hello.
If a business closed, instead of outright deleting its node, which destroys this object's history and makes that address unsearchable, it's much better to use lifecycle prefixes as documented in osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Or at the very least delete biz-specific tags but leave the address node in place.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137488798

Based on the brand, I'm guessing it's not table tennis but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teqball
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137480912

Hello.
When tagging sidewalks in NYC, generally the ones that are poured in place are just "concrete". "concrete:plates" are intended for the ones poured offsite and moved in-place as a whole, such as bridge spans as an obvious example.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137462371

Hello.
Why was relation/15987302 created at all?
As documented in osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories relations are not intended as "collections" of somewhat related features into one group.

Additionally, as documented in osm.wiki/Proposal:Power_routing_proposal/Tagging_similar_to_Transportation_routes type=route + route=power relation type is only in the proposal stage and was never accepted as a community standard.

wikidata= tag is for the feature itself.
operator:wikidata= tag is for the company, as the name implies.
A bunch of electrical wires is not a company... A company manages and operates them..

Another example let's say there's some notable building that has a wikidata article on it. Building's article would go into wikidata= tag and property owner or real estate company or management company would go into operator:wikidata=

I guess in their opinion sacrifice of a bar vs theirs-perceived benefit to other biz worth it.

opposes safe streets as in they want dangerous streets?🤨
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137428977

Hello.
You once again make giant changesets with A LOT of incorrect tagging.
Once again, description= tag is NOT intended for you documenting or how or when you mapped something. It is intended as a description of a given feature.
Additionally, in virtually every single features you mapped you added a business as a wikidata proper of a feature. That is most definitely incorrect. It should be mapped as operator:wikidata.
It's been at least 10 days since your edit and you haven't fixed these errors.
Please correct them or your edits will be reverted in whole and your account forwarded to DWG, which might result in account block or even ban.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137389586

Hello.
Shouldn't this be cuisine=mexican, and therefore tacos=yes as an additional tag to more explicitly indicate what kind of Mexican food?
Even if not, according to cuisine=* values should be singular, not plural, so "taco".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137330473

Hello.
Your edit intentionally made the previously properly mapped data incorrect. If you continue to vandalize data like that, your account will be referred to DWG which can result in suspension or even outright ban.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137308968

Hello.
If you are mapping sidewalks, they are supposed to be tagged as such, and not just footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137307069

Hello.
If you are mapping sidewalks, they are supposed to be tagged as such, and not just footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137306741

Hello.
If you are mapping sidewalks, they are supposed to be tagged as such, and not just footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137306436

@Tatti Barletta, if you see wrong data, it should either be reverted or corrected.

If this is not a real name, we shouldn't really invent them. It's fine for a feature to be without a name.
It's perfectly fine to add description explaining what it is though.