OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
137480912

Based on the brand, I'm guessing it's not table tennis but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teqball
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137480912

137462371

Hello.
When tagging sidewalks in NYC, generally the ones that are poured in place are just "concrete". "concrete:plates" are intended for the ones poured offsite and moved in-place as a whole, such as bridge spans as an obvious example.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137462371

137461618

Hello.
Why was relation/15987302 created at all?
As documented in osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories relations are not intended as "collections" of somewhat related features into one group.

Additionally, as documented in osm.wiki/Proposal:Power_routing_proposal/Tagging_similar_to_Transportation_routes type=route + route=power relation type is only in the proposal stage and was never accepted as a community standard.

137389586

wikidata= tag is for the feature itself.
operator:wikidata= tag is for the company, as the name implies.
A bunch of electrical wires is not a company... A company manages and operates them..

Another example let's say there's some notable building that has a wikidata article on it. Building's article would go into wikidata= tag and property owner or real estate company or management company would go into operator:wikidata=

137428977

I guess in their opinion sacrifice of a bar vs theirs-perceived benefit to other biz worth it.

137428977

opposes safe streets as in they want dangerous streets?🤨
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137428977

137389586

Hello.
You once again make giant changesets with A LOT of incorrect tagging.
Once again, description= tag is NOT intended for you documenting or how or when you mapped something. It is intended as a description of a given feature.
Additionally, in virtually every single features you mapped you added a business as a wikidata proper of a feature. That is most definitely incorrect. It should be mapped as operator:wikidata.
It's been at least 10 days since your edit and you haven't fixed these errors.
Please correct them or your edits will be reverted in whole and your account forwarded to DWG, which might result in account block or even ban.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137389586

137330473

Hello.
Shouldn't this be cuisine=mexican, and therefore tacos=yes as an additional tag to more explicitly indicate what kind of Mexican food?
Even if not, according to cuisine=* values should be singular, not plural, so "taco".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137330473

137308968

Hello.
Your edit intentionally made the previously properly mapped data incorrect. If you continue to vandalize data like that, your account will be referred to DWG which can result in suspension or even outright ban.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137308968

137307069

Hello.
If you are mapping sidewalks, they are supposed to be tagged as such, and not just footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137307069

137306741

Hello.
If you are mapping sidewalks, they are supposed to be tagged as such, and not just footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137306741

137306436

Hello.
If you are mapping sidewalks, they are supposed to be tagged as such, and not just footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137306436

137302157

@Tatti Barletta, if you see wrong data, it should either be reverted or corrected.

137157510

If this is not a real name, we shouldn't really invent them. It's fine for a feature to be without a name.
It's perfectly fine to add description explaining what it is though.

137079794

What is that phone number? It doesn't seem to belong to delta

137242930

Hello.
Proposed features really shouldn't go into OSM. OSM is a map about what's in the world NOW, not how it's going to be at some point in indeterminate future.
What's the use of having non-existing features on the map? Once the project starts and they start digging, I can see the map getting updated as it progresses. But having the whole thing there while it's going to take 5, 10, 20 years to complete is unnecessary map clutter.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137242930

137226251

This edit has similar mistakes as the previous one. american_handball != handball.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137226251

137226134

Hello.
Most of these features appear to be incorrectly tagged.
Handball is not the same sport as American Handball
sport=american_handball
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_handball
Also of those features do not appear to be american handball courts atll, but tennis courts, hockey field.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137226134

137171891

Hello.
Similar question to the previous edit, does this cable and wind farm actually exist already or it's going to be constructed at some point in the future?
And once again, this cable is connected to many features, such as the boundary of US, which doesn't seem correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137171891

137168044

Hello.
The feature that you mapped, does it already exist or just planned?
Also why is this cable attached to a ferry route?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137168044