Hello.
This edit contains similar problem as the previous edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132878157

Hello.
Please note that his edit is invalid and is going to be reverted.
These buildings are already properly mapped using relation method. When buildings are mapped like that ONLY relation itself must contain building-related tags. Lines such relation consist of must be tagless.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132877916

Hello.
When editing in OSM please submit our edits grouped into smaller geographic regions, such as neighborhoods, cities or at most states.
Doing so not only makes it easier to review your edits, spotting any potential problems, but also help you preserve your work if something happens to your browser and it crashes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132861087

Climbing playground with surface of asphalt?🤨 That's going to be a lot of broken bones and lawsuits...
Also please note that in OSM multiple values should be listed using ; not , or _
For example "material=metal;wood"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132852523

dance:teaching=* ....?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132850099

Hello.
When iD is warning you that a sidewalk is crossing water, don't just click "make a ford" to make that warning go away. :) This is most definitely not a ford, but a bridge. These sections of sidewalks should've been tagged as such..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132844081

Hello.
Please note that crosswalks with traffic lights and crosswalks with stop signs have different tags. Please pay attention to select the correct ones when you tag them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132843570

Hello.
You mapped sidewalks on Brighton 2nd Pl as crosswalks. Please pay attention what kind of ways you have selected. :)
Additionally, when mapping sidewalks, please pay attention to iD editor's warnings about crossing ways and connect them where appropriate. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132839964

Hello.
Rather than amenity=community_centre this seems to be more suitable as office=security.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132839107

Hello.
Rather than adding such tiny landuse, wouldn't it better to just tag the building as dormitory?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132810125

Hello.
Please split your edits into smaller geographic regions so that's easier to review them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132800976

Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are you mapping here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132798660

Hello.
Do you know if the playground south of the school associated with that school?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132798285

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you convert this from building:part into just plain area? And what exactly do you mean by Stuytown Gyms? What kind of feature is this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132771884

It doesn't matter if it's local area or not.🙂

But if a feature is tagged as it doesn't exist, all the other facts become irrelevant.. because it doesn't exist anymore.
I don't know how exactly you are processing OSM data but adding support for features that are tagged as closed seems like a very logical thing to do.

disused: lifecycle prefix is a standard way to tag closed places... disused:=**

Hello.
This is already tagged as disused:amenity=atm, so
there's no need to add disused:currency:XBT to it. Data consumers already know that it doesn't exist.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132770099

I'm not sure if curb cutouts is an endorsement by DoT that people can cross there.
At the very least I think we definitely shouldn't tag unmarked crosswalks where there are 3 marked and 1 unmarked on an intersection.

Hello.
I see that in many places you've been adding crossing=unmarked. I'm not sure if this is correct to map them. Streets are intended to be crossed where there's a crosswalk. If you map unmarked crosswalks then logically speaking 100% of the area between 2 parallel sidewalks should be marked as unmarked crosswalk since you can cross the street at any point.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132750938

That doesn't seem to be grammatically correct for the Russian language rules. These are 2 and 3 separate words, not joined words. 🤔