I see what you tried to do here. However, please note that this way of tagging is outdated! Please see highway=service#Deprecated:_highway=service_for_busways
I see that you made similar changes in other places. Please correct your mistake.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129580686

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change this road designation?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129580870

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? It looks you change a major road into a service road?!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129580686

Hello.
What are you trying to tag here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129580664

Hello.
Please note that as documented in osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element it's incorrect to map the same restaurant as both node and tags on the building polygon.
Additionally, if a business occupies only a part of a building, such as just the ground floor, it is incorrect to tag that business as the whole building. In this case AsianTaste86, Yaya Tea and Sky Cafe should've been tagged only as nodes. 👍🙂
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129579911

That link gives me 404 error.
If the historic name was Newtown, is the name you entered for Elmhurst or Newtown?

Hmm.. Satellite imagery shows that lane markings start at least after Farrington Street. Additionally official NYC roads database states that there are 3 lanes https://imgur.com/a/ZwjO1o8
I guess it's just a deficiency of StreetComplete app because according to lanes=* it's valid to have no lane markings tag AND have lanes count tag.

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? Why were these tags removed?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129537703

I'm referring to this very edit. You easily what was edited at https://osmcha.org/changesets/129422551/

Hello.
Rather than just completely deleting this node, it's much better to use lifecycle prefix as documented in osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least delete just the business-specific info, but left the address node intact. That way you'll be preserving history of this object and this address remains searchable.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129450841

You just deleted biz name but left all the other information intact...?

If you search for the old bin on nycaabs page, on BBL line if you click on "Browse BBL @ BIS" you'll see all the BINs registered on that property, including obsolete and current BINs
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129441117

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete this business name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129422551

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you put 4 lanes on some of these segments when satellite imagery shows there are 6?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129421539

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? You tagged this street as not having lane markings where there's clearly 3 lanes there..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129409249

Hello.
Could you please explain why did you delete this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129395918

Hello.
Please note that Concord is already mapped. As such your addition is a duplicate and will be reverted since it goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129388528

Hello.
What is the meaning of the name "Doctor Urcuyo (strange)"?

Hello.
Please split up your edits into smaller geographic regions. Cities, counties or states at most. Your 700+ changes over most of NE US is very difficult to review.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129342185

Yes, that sounds like a more appropriate tag for this. It also says there are 17 benches? I don't know how familiar you are with that area and how exactly they are separated, if it would be viable to map them individually?