OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
119243561

Nebraska covers all of continental US?๐Ÿคจ

119234979

Hello.
It appears that you accidentally dragged a sidewalk node many streets away.
I have correct this mistake, but in the future please try to double-check your changes so that not to damage map data. ๐Ÿ‘
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119234979

119217384

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete existing sidewalk and properly mapped crosswalk and instead drew a new one?

Generally it's best edit and update existing features rather than delete and recreate. That way you preserve history of that object and ability to properly revert if necessary.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119217384

115446690

It needs to be updated in the NSI template too otherwise the next person fixing such warning will clubber your changes.

115446690

I believe it's coming from https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/main/data/transit/route/bus.json#L1370

115446690

iD prompted to update these tags based on its template.. or at least it did at the time when I was editing it.

119137062

Thank you for fixing the shape. :) ๐Ÿ‘
What about the construction site polygon around it? I imagine since this building is complete and occupied it shouldn't be inside of the construction site?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119137062

119127771

It looks like there are 3 buildings?
But at the very least the shape should be updated to the actual outline of the buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119127771

119089979

For one, if I were to search for such an address, getting a building as a result is more useful than a whole area including playgrounds and sport fields and parking lots and whatever else might be included.

I don't have first hand experience with this, but I'd imagine that for data consumers it's easier to have one schema of encoding address of schools rather than implementing every possible variation one could come across.

Also I could be misremembering, but I think there are some validators that complain about "address inside of address" check, ie area has an address and there's a node or building with same/different address inside of that area.

119089979

There's amenity=school#How_to_map

It doesn't explicitly mention the addr: tag, however if you think about this logically, school grounds can encompass multiple buildings with separate addresses. Putting address into school ground area would prevent you from accurately representing addresses.
A more extremely example would be NYU with buildings and campuses all over the city. You wouldn't tag the whole campus with a single address...

119089979

Hello.
Regarding ps140, generally address tags go on the building, not school grounds...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119089979

119050535

That's alright, I'll fix that tag for you. ๐Ÿ‘
Does Alumni Hall occupy just that building or extends somewhere else?

118913275

But you removed the hotel tag...

Please note that these kind of edits are incorrect. It is wrong to intentionally edit the map with wrong info just so that it looks better on the map. Please see this article for more details: osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

119050535

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete building part tag here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119050535

119002167

Is that intersection actually pedestrian signal but permanently no markings? Looking at Bing satellite it looks like much darker asphalt, so perhaps just brand new pavement but didn't get around to putting down crosswalk paint? Bing streetview imagery shows very worn-out crosswalk paint, but it's from 2014. https://streets.planning.nyc.gov has imagery every 2 years dating back to 2001 and even 1996 and this intersection's configuration didn't change since.

119004182

So what exactly did you map here? Atrium?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119004182

119002167

I'd imagine you could list both with ";", but wouldn't "traffic_signal" imply that it's marked? Other than temporary after repaving, are there any traffic light crosswalks without stripes?

119002176

As far as I remember, that pedestrian pathway's surface is just asphalt and not cement slabs as typical sidewalks.

119002167

"crossing=marked" is for crosswalks with stop sign. crosswalks with traffic lights are "crossing=traffic_signals"

119001229

What is the previous location?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119001229