Perhaps Eltingville Blvd should get parking tags too? Or at least parking:right=separate osm.wiki/Street_parking#Separately_mapped_parking_areas_and_spaces
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149455834

Additionally, "Chicago West", "Chicago North", "Atlanta", etc must not be in the name tag but rather in the branch= tag, specifically intended for this kind of information.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149454248

Hello.
As documented in phone=*#Usage phone numbers must contain country dialing code(in US it's +1) and they must be separated either by space or dash "-".

Furthermore, street names must be fully spelled out, not abbreviated. Not "E Roosevelt Road" but "Roosevelt Road" or "East Roosevelt Road", whichever is appropriate.
Both of these problems must be corrected.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149454248

I understand the intention of not allowing bikes or pedestrians, but =customers is rather confusing... customers of what?🤔

Hello.
What do you mean here by motor_vehicle=customers?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149440730

I found my workflow that works for me and I'll continue to review at the rate that I find suitable to me.
There are no other volunteers reviewing things. I see shit that doesn't get fixed for days, weeks, months and even years.

Not having made a single change in the last 2 months, what brings you to this changeset? 🤨

On daily basis I review 100-300 changesets. It's unrealistic to expect to send a private message in addition to a changeset comment on every changeset that needs fixing or clarification. Changeset comments were created with the specific purpose of public communication about that change. Sending private messages defeats that purpose.
Furthermore, I personally use Gmail and have no problems with receiving and seeing any changeset messages I get. None of them ever go to spam or otherwise get filtered. 🤷

This is an incorrect approach. You are essentially mangling the data to suit one specific application's idiosyncrasies. This is considered osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer and shouldn't be done. The application itself needs to be fixed to address this deficiency rather than the underlying data.

Hello.
Please update your StreetComplete app. The version you are using is pretty old. There have been many improvements since then.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149414345

Hello.
Why did you tag this as tourist attraction? Seems like a very strange category for such an organization.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149408222

Maison de Viennoiserie kept the same phone number as the previous biz?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149395903

surface=*?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149390044

Hello.
Please pay attention to accurately tag whether a crosswalk has traffic lights or not. Intersections with traffic lights can often be spotted by diagonal gantries extending from the corners of the intersection. This is not always the case, but very often.
Alternatively, STOP sign intersections will often have "STOP" written on the road just before cars' stop line.

Also, please pay attention to position curbs where they actually are, and not at just a random corner of 2 sidewalks.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149371722

They maybe are from Seatle, but that doesn't really matter.
They have 11k edits, account is over 10 years old, and they used "Go Map!!" to make those changes. "Go Map!!" is iOS counterpart to desktop iD and Android's Vespucci. So, it's possible that they were there in person, saw that it was closed and marked it.

The fact that it doesn't show up a certain way in certain map styles doesn't mean we should fudge tags. That would be osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer and that's bad.
It might not look green in the default OSM style, but it looks just fine in another map style.
Our primary concern is for the tags to be accurate, not for the map to look pretty. 🙂 The way the map looks can always be fixed, but the underlying data is wrong...🤷 garbage in - garbage out.

Yes, in changeset/149353815 it was deleted and before that in changeset/149353771 it was marked as closed. I reverted deletion so that at least the node with its history remains. But if you know that this biz is actually open, feel free to correct this.

Hello.
Why did you add these needless nodes? If a feature is straight, then it should be represented with the minimum number of nodes, ie start and finish.
Please see osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_straight_ways_straight
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149348469

If it's a "park", then it shouldn't be "garden:type=". However, the name seems to indicate that this is a garden...?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149338085

If you are adding a photo of the steps, perhaps add it to the steps way?

Ah, I see you fixed it in the following edit. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149336546