yes, i don't doubt it exists 🙂
It draw my attention because it looked like somebody was vandal-tagging a street-as-park for pokemon go😅 but then realized it was you.
the reason why i questioned park status is 1) it wasn't on nycgovparks.org 2)when i started looking further into it and saw those articles but it still didn't seem to me like what we normally tag as parks.

Are there street signs with that name, or if you were to mail something to 123 Paseo Park would it arrive to 123 34th Ave?

I do think it should be somehow tagged, but if it's not a street name I'm not sure how🤔
Maybe loc_name?

i know what strava is, but i don't use it.
are you biking or running?
i'm not understanding what you are trying to explain. So when you are going from a sidewalk of Riverside Drive across the overpass, it routes you only to the south of Greenway and not to the north?

are you using some navigation or routing software?

Hello.
The changes you made around the Brooklyn Bridge will be reverted. "highway=footway" already implies "foot=yes" without having to tag it. Additionally, you drew a new footway on top of existing one. That's obviously not correct.

What is your source that bikes are allowed everywhere in Flush Park?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139771048

Could you please elaborate why do you feel that this way is not two-way?

Hello.
Please note that mapping overlapping ways is not a correct approach.
Also please note that foot paths are assumed to be two-way ways without having to explicitly indicate it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139769846

Hello.
Similar to your previous edit, "direction=both" is not a valid tag. You can use "oneway=no" to explicitly indicate that traffic is allowed in both directions. However, this being a highway=footway, being able to go in both directions is implicit by default.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139765749

Hello.
Please note that "direction=both" is not a valid combination. If you want to indicate that a way allows traffic in both directions, the appropriate way to tag it would be "oneway=no".
Please see oneway=* for more detailed explanation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139765737

Using the building's BIN you can look up its zoning documents which should contain general architectural drawings with height measurements of each section.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139760715

How come you deleted those road segments behind the school?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139760323

In this edit way/1197112418 is connected only to a sidewalk rather than a street
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139757430

Is it correct to tag this as "park"? It seems like various pedestrian and mixed traffic streets rather than a park..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139757281

Hello.
On a bunch of these driveways you connected them only to sidewalks rather than to roads as well.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139756636

Hello.
You added way/1043368741 to this relation. It looks to be completely separate. Is that accurate?
You also didn't include any info in network, operator or ref tags..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139730959

Similar to your other edit, shouldn't this be =customers or =permit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139729377

It probably shouldn't be =private but instead =customers or =permit.
Please see access=* for detailed explanation of this tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139724801

Hello.
When mapping curbs and especially curb cuts, they shouldn't be glued to the sidewalks. They should be positioned exactly where they are and additional sidewalk segments drawn to connect them.
If you glue curbs to the middle of sidewalk that means that there's a curb in the middle of the sidewalk...obviously not correct. Routing/navigation software that accounts for wheelchairs or bikes or people with low vision will have inaccurate information and could potentially reroute them far away because of such a mistake..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139723697

Hello.
In NYC every building has "nycdoitt:bin=" tag which contains its BIN ID from NYC's department of buildings database allowing us to lookup various metadata about that building such as height, floors, date of construction, etc.
When you replace an old building with a new one, please try to preserve that tag, either by updating it to the current building's id or at least by renaming that tag to old_nycdoitt:bin= so that in the future it can be referenced and updated. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139706704

Shouldn't this just be surface= tag?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139698961