Hello.
Why did you delete all the info from Pita Grill POI?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134460666

There's no point adding a _new_ amenity that's already tagged as _disused_. Especially without any other address info.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134433639

Hello.
Please note that phone numbers should follow a standard format as documented in phone=*#Usage
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134431333

Hello.
This place changed from a restaurant to a laundromat but kept the same phone number?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134431316

Hello.
Could you please confirm if this food truck actually has that address? Also since it's a food truck, it can be there today, but gone tomorrow. As such it's a temporary feature and shouldn't be mapped.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134431118

Hello.
Please note that phone number should follow a specific format as documented in phone=*#Usage
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134425949

Vandalism reverted.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134418717

Vandalism reverted.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134423061

Vandalism reverted in 134560122
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134311301

Hello.
What did you mean when you mapped this zipcar feature?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134394102

The whole giant area is a ventilation shaft?🤨 This doesn't seem correct...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134388448

All the info I have shows that it doesn't exist there.

Please provide some supporting evidence that it's there.

You can create description= tag explaining what it is for users to possibly see, or a note= tag for other mappers to see if you think some feature might be confusing for others to understand(and possibly alter it in incorrect way).

You shouldn't invent names for features just so that their labels show up on the map. That's called osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer and that's incorrect to do. For us mappers, the most important thing is to make sure that the underlying data is accurate. Then it's up to the different map styles to make sure that relevant features are as readable as possible. But if you fudge the data to look good in one map style, it might look wrong, broken or even not show up at all in another map style.

Yes, it's perfectly normal for features not to have name= tag if they are unnamed...
I already redraw this parking lot as an area to more accurately represent its shape, rather than just an undetermined node. 👍

This edit doesn't seem correct.
The small intersecting segments should still be tagged as sidewalks since that's what they are...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134282021

Hello.
These changes seem to be incorrect.
Crosswalks with traffic lights should be tagged as crossing=traffic_signals.
Crosswalks with STOP sign should be tagged as crossing=marked or crossing=uncontrolled.
Is the satellite imagery that shows this is a traffic lights intersection outdated?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134281901

Please note that addr:unit tag is intended for..units, suites, apartments, etc. If you want to tag floor number, you can use addr:floor= tag. Please correct his.

You named a feature as "Materials for the Arts (ran by the city)". Is "(ran by the city)" actually part of the name or something you added?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134280962

Hello.
You mapped The Collective Paper Factory hotel, however I see that there's already mapped The Paper Factory Hotel. Are these features different?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134279575