Máme extra tag pro vodní vlek? https://www.wakearealy.cz/cze/arealy/jedovnice/

Yes, the location after your change is more precise. Thank you.

How did you come there is roundabout beside the tankstation. I just drive through this crossing road and it is normal crossings. No roundabout there.

Ouch, you are right. I checked it again and yes, it is 200 kW. Thank you for the check.

Hele ten rozcestník u žst Dobrovice jsi opravdu viděl? Protože já tam byl před dvouma týdnama a žádný rozcestník tam nebyl. Jenom čtvercová značka ukončující trasu.

I understand you. I am oposed to using names on objects that does not have in fact name too. And you are not alone who think that this is not correct usage on charging stations - see osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station#Examples_misusing_'name'_tag But nothing changed from 2018. The examples are there and in fact for past few years they are heavily used for charging station. I just checked and it name is used for 36 % of charging station. Some of them use just the "ref" which is IMO bad (Oelde in this case). Some type of the amenity "Ladestation Hellweg 1". Some reapat the brand with some info "Tesla destination charger". I think it will be hard to find consensus in this changelog entry. I will welcome if you can find agreement on tag-list - or in a discussion of that wiki page.

Oelde is how name it Ionity. See https://ionity.eu/en/network/network-status And having name of the brand in the name=* is common practise. It is even in the example in wiki page amenity=charging_station#Examples

Domnívám se, že tohle není ostrov. Viz např. definice ostrova na wikipedii. Kdyby místo toho kanálu byla přirozená řeka, tak prosím, ale takto ne.

Proč by tohle měl být ostrov?

You're welcome. I am here on holiday. Feel free to correct me, if I step over some local standard.

Co to je za pamětihodnost? Tam nevypadá, že by tam něco bylo.

Souhlasím s Piskvorem. Ta cesta je evidentně značená v reálu po dvou různých cestách, tak by měla být v i mapě na obou cestách. To, že jedna z nich má jakousi preferenci je hezké, ale zanést do mapy to neumíme. Mimochodem pokud koukám na Panoramu, tak cesta za tunelem pro cyklisty pokracuje po obou cestach. Jak po te stezce vedle silnice, tak i po silnici. Akorát dál za tunelem už není vyhražený průh. Ale cykloznačení tam je.

Why did you done this change? It is obviously not true.

Spravna pripominka. Smazano.

Ahoj. při mapování el. dobíječek nemapujem každý jednotlivý stojan (stejně jako u benzinek), ale popisujeme to kapacitou a počtem zásuvek. Podobně operátor nenín "ČEZ (CCS/CHAdeMO/Mennekes type2)" ale jenom "ČEZ".
Opravím to.

Jaj. Opraveno. Já se to po sobě snažím kontrolovat druhý den v POI importeru, ale tohle mi nějak uteklo.
Díky za postřeh.

Taky zdravim.
Budu jenom rad, kdyz to po me overite, ta GPS v tech ulicich dost litala.
Pridal jsem tu znacku co je v iD editoru. Osobne mi prijde ze v tom znaceni prechodu je dost bordel. A pokud iD editor pouziva neco co neni schvalene (coz evidentne dela, bo to je teprve proposal), tak by OSM melo vydat nejake prohlaseni ze se iD editor nema pouzivat nebo aspon nejake jeho featury.

Jako disused ji oznacila Majka. Viz node/4782711721/history Ja si toho nevsiml, jdu to disused oddelat.

I googled the script to check squarity of buildings and I found it at https://www.missingmaps.org/assets/downloads/MissingMaps_validation_josm_en.pdf Thanks for pointers.

I did not check the objects out of the tile. This particular task is about buildings only. So I did not check the roads - thou I just fixed that clear mistake on road 413 - which evens runs through building. At the start of mapathong I did not run JOSM validation, just checked that manualy. This was my first batch of validation. I have been told by my mentor on mapathon, that there is no need to squaring of every building, just those that are clearly not good-aligned. I welcome any comments or suggestions, which can improve my skills as this was my first validation session.