see note/1202016

Can you look at note/1200172 ?

Why you changed name to include one of buses stopping here?

Sorry for bothering you about an ancient change - but can you look at note/1196954 ?

What is the purpose of tiger:cfcc tag? Can it be safely deleted by people editing ways? What about tiger:county?

Dzięki za mapowanie!

Zerkniesz na note/1197355 ?

can you look at note/1197054 ?

Zerkniesz na note/1197048 ?

Mam wątpliwości czy way/422918723#map=18/49.95221/22.27450 rzeczywiście miało mieć horse=designated

It would be more useful to mention what was changed in edit rather than where it was made (where edit was made is already clear as OSM stores locations of edited objects)

Please, see note/1196009

name is for name only.

Adding height in feet is tagging for renderer - see osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Why edits are made is such groups that bboxes are obnoxiously large?

Is this low quality import documented anywhere?

Ut added many low-quality geometries, I suspect that fixing them (like way/42224008 ) takes more time than mapping from scratch.

And that is skipping damage to community.

amenity driving_school pasuje?

this changeset added way/233910659 with an absurd note:en that may cause OSM editors to avid editing this object.

It is unacceptable to declare OSM object as uneditable.

Also, demanding reports of changes without making clear how changes should be reported is absurd.

"Mobility stations will be imported into OSM automatically by user Teddych. Do not update them in OSM, report changes to Mobility directly."

Zerkniesz na note/1193500 ?

Jeśli podpisano umowę na realizację to nie znaczy że budowa się zaczęła.

prawidłowy opis:

comment: dodanie ścieżek, strumienia, mostów, nazwy
source: old survey

Nie wprowadzaj celowo nieprawidłowych danych ze względu na sposób ich wyświetlania.

Tym bardziej nie usuwał prawidłowych danych tylko dlatego bo jeden z wielu stylów mapy pokazuje je w nieoczekiwany przez ciebie sposób.