Hello!

You used
railway=Signal Box
on way/188310328/history

Have you maybe meant
railway=signal_box
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Thanks!

Hello!

You used
railway=railno
on way/801778996/history

Have you maybe meant
railway=rail
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
healthcare:speciality=paediatrics;
on node/13338886978/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare:speciality=paediatrics
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
healthcare=hospital.
on node/13482552611/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare=hospital
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
healthcare=clinice
on node/7871077754/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare=clinic
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
healthcare=dentistry
on node/13366883206/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare=dentist
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
healthcare=dentistry
on node/430352213/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare=dentist
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
healthcare=nurse;
on node/13059504149/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare=nurse
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello! node/12198939560/history has shop = baozi that was added in this edit
shop=baozi ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from shop=* or osm.wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?

Hello! node/10046673125/history has roof = cone that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=cone was intended here?

See roof:shape=* and roof=*

Hello! way/226293093/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! way/104964298/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! way/81574877/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! way/216496942/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/5333302298/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/13512505055/history has bicycle:repair = no that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/13374936734/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello!

You used
memorial=stoner
on node/13375976886/history

Have you maybe meant
memorial=stone
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
material=steelg
on node/13403987192/history

Have you maybe meant
material=steel
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?