edycja chyba wycofana w changeset/177727445

wycofanie edycji drogi istotnej klasy bez dyskusji

changeset/177738088

"gdyz nie maja one nowej nazwy ani miejsce nie przestalo istniec" - to tak nie działa, nazwa może wygasnąć bez pojawienia się nowej, nawet jak miejsce nadal istnieje

with foot=yes tag rather than access:foot = yes?

Hello!

You used
place=islet;
on way/364742092/history

Have you maybe meant
place=islet
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
place=islet;
on way/24937024/history

Have you maybe meant
place=islet
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
place=islet;
on way/25045679/history

Have you maybe meant
place=islet
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
incline=up+
on way/409773803/history

Have you maybe meant
incline=up
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
crossing:markings=zebraww
on way/1053017499/history

Have you maybe meant
crossing:markings=zebra
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
crossing:markings=zebrab
on node/4923676038/history

Have you maybe meant
crossing:markings=zebra
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
craft=stonemasonry
on node/13422222122/history

Have you maybe meant
craft=stonemason
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
colour=weiß
on node/13468307964/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
roof:shape=flatm
on way/101125197/history

Have you maybe meant
roof:shape=flat
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
roof:shape=flat7
on way/298551124/history

Have you maybe meant
roof:shape=flat
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello! node/9968999509/history has shop = materiales_de_construccion that was added in this edit
shop=materiales_de_construccion ? shop=building_materials ( shop=building_materials ) or shop=trade + trade=building_supplies ( trade=building_supplies ) was likely meant

Hello! node/13013815968/history has shop = 휴대폰액세서리 that was added in this edit
is it shop=mobile_phone_accessories ? or is something else matching?

See shop=mobile_phone_accessories

Hello! node/481160147/history has access:foot = yes that was added in this edit
Would using foot access tag (see foot=* ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/foot/&***/access%3Afoot/

hello!

way/1459615366/history - that was supposed to be shop=shoes - right?

node/12596421922/history - wait, is it mostly about loans or is it about insurance?

maybe this undiscussed import by raimundosbc should be reverted altogether instead?