Satellite imagery does not show any ponds nor parks. Those areas are normal residential areas with buildings.

Thanks for contributing, but driveways are a valid type of data that we normally keep in OSM.

Hi,
thanks for contributing, but even though the name contains word "park" it is a golf course and not a park.

Hi Frank,
thanks for contributing.
Yeah the building shape doesn't reflect the reality. But in iD editor you can switch background imagery (press B) to "MetroCOG othoimagery 2019" and draw it more precisely.
Cheers

Hi and thanks for contributing.

Things to improve for next submissions:
1) Parts of address go to different tag
addr:housenumber = street number
addr:street = full street name (no abbreviations like St, Ave,..)
addr:unit = Suite number (without word suite)

2) Telephone numbers have to have international predial +1-203-...

3) We don't use tag "Country". No need to add it.

4) Don't add "Category" tag. It's already described in office=newspaper

Thanks in advance

Was probably to improve the road shape accuracy
https://osmcha.org/changesets/125488424/

Hi,
you were told multiple times to not create overlaps between green and fairway polygons, and to stop avoiding using of multipolygons by drawing the shape around bunkers. Please comply with the community rules.

Hi and thanks for contributing to OSM.
However, I could notice that the buildings you drew are not very precise. Almost all of them dont follow the real shape of the building you can see from the imagery and many don't have their internal angles at 90˚.
Could you please go thought your buildings again and adjust the shape so it reflects the reality? To adjust the angles you can press "Q" and the edit will do it automatically.

Another thing is, could you explain why you changed this research institute to a restaurant? node/6276061706
thanks

Thanks it looks all good.
The only thing that's missing is connection between the "crossing" and "road" lines. At their intersection they should share a node, which should be tagged as 'highway=crossing'.
I added them for you. Just have a look.
Cheers

All looks good.
Great job!

Hi and thanks for contributing to OSM!
I checked and the building still appears on all recent aerial imagery. I guess what makes it confusing is that it is split into several building parts with different heights.
I think the easiest way for you to add a new business would be to create a new point and mark it as a new restaurant.. etc. That way you don't need to deal with complicated buildings or drawing new building outlines.
Cheers
Mashin

Hi,
there are several things that are wrong with your edits.
1) Please don't delte existing objects to replace them with a new version. You can drag the nodes/points of the old shape to adjust the accuracy.
2) Don't create "lollipop extensions" like you did here: way/109463818
If there is a bunker in the fairway you have to use "multipolygon".

You can get more information by reading these pages:
leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
osm.wiki/Multipolygon_Examples

Please, don't delete existing objects. If you need to change their shape then drag their nodes to new positions.

Hi.
When drawing greens and fairways please don't create overlaps between the areas. Please see here for more details: leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls

No problem. Things like this just happen.
Cheers
Mashin

hi, thanks for working on OSM, but those are not railway crossings. Railway leads on a bridge over the road so those two never physically meet.

Please do not retag building outlines as `building:parts` in order to hide them from your golf app.

Hi, No Trespassing sign is not a reason for removing a road. In such cases we add 'access=private' tag.

Hi and thanks for contributing to OSM, but has the road beed completely removed? It is clearly visible on aerial imagery.

Hi,
thanks for your good work, but before you do further road classification changes in CT, would you mind contacting jnighan and consulting wiki?
osm.wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification

Recently all roads were tidied up and so let's be careful to not make a mess out of it again. Thanks