Luzandro's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 139004472 | leider nicht das erste Mal, siehe https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2019-September/010252.html |
|
| 139502290 | Hi, I've restored "Wiener Tierschutzverein" as old_name, so that both names can be found (actually legally it's still called "Wiener Tierschutzverein", "Tierschutz Austria" is only the publicly used trademark) |
|
| 127257014 | Hi, i've just corrected some of your changes where you swapped left and right and changed cycleway=opposite_lane to cycleway:right=lane + cycleway:left=no, so please pay a little more attention to the correct side of the road
|
|
| 112404365 | Hallo, du hast hier angegeben, dass es in der Graf-Starhemberg-Gasse keine Fahrradspuren gibt. Es gibt zwar keinen durchgehenden Streifen aber durchaus Markierungen auf der Fahrbahn, da das Fahren gegen die Einbahn erlaubt ist. In StreetComplete wird diese Variante auch unter dem Namen "explizit gemeinsamer Fahrstreifen mit Autos" angeboten. Siehe auch changeset/133990070 |
|
| 133990070 | I've set up a MapRoulette Challenge for these cases: https://maproulette.org/challenge/40569 |
|
| 133990070 | 1) the rendering of the OpenCycleMap is not such a great argument, that had already many other problems in the past and IMHO an oneway:bicycle=no would not necessarily need any markings so this is first of all a bug of the OpenCycleMap 2) but like Kevin said, many times there are actually markings, at least as shared lane, like here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=19.809686532448527&lat=48.18893611111099&lng=16.370963888889037&pKey=1394005871031089&focus=photo&x=0.48577229844253345&y=0.6506645048407272&zoom=0 osm.wiki/DE:Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane 3) and finally: it's good practice to not change the tagging style without contributing anything new. In this changeset 149 cycleway:left=no + cycleway:right=no were changed to cycleway=no
|
|
| 139179008 | Yeah, at first I wanted to revert the name change, but on the other hand it also matches the URL and is written at the entry like that, so I guess it's not that clear, which one to prefer and the important thing is only that both can be found. |
|
| 139179008 | Hi, I have restored "English Cinema Haydn" at least as alt_name. This is also the name they use on the website you entered.
|
|
| 138873372 | Hallo, ich bin bisher nur mit dem Auto vorbeigefahren und kann nicht sagen, ob der neue Gehsteig tatsächlich irgendwo 2m breit ist, für den Großteil davon und v.a. auch den bestehenden Teil im Süden erscheint mir das aber deutlich zu breit
|
|
| 139071490 | Hallo, ich habe die Brücke mit den Straßen verbunden, damit sie nicht unroutbar in der Luft hängt, und die Lage ein wenig entspr. Strava heatmap angepasst |
|
| 138173326 | note/3779313
|
|
| 137316849 | btw. the comment on the note, "there is no need for a picture, because I have been there and mapped the object" is also an interesting contribution to the discussion |
|
| 137316849 | seems like I was a little bit too optimistic that fkv will leave the tag until he discusses it with a wider audience and finds someone who supports his view. Here are a few more pictures from mihai3: |
|
| 125718953 | ||
| 137316849 | Here is a photo of the tunnel exit we're talking about: https://i.imgur.com/wHSJL5O.jpeg I have now restored the tunnel and I am confident that fkv will accept it this time and manage to count more than 3 people who disagree with his opinion when recounting and not a single one who shares it |
|
| 125714647 | ||
| 137316849 | > "footways" that are really alpine climbing paths There are people, who consider climbing routes of grade 7 to be highway=path |
|
| 138226868 | Wenn ich das richtig sehe, ist "Kirche zum Franz von Assisi" wohl old_name und "Tempel der Jungfrau" alt_name https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pfarrkirche_Am_Schöpfwerk&uselang=de |
|
| 138226868 | Hallo,
|
|
| 17036896 | schon ein Zeiterl her, aber siehe note/3768515 |