Thank you for clarifying. The combination of access=no and foot=yes makes sense here. access=yes was not explicitly provided for any of these originally, but perhaps the editor you're using marked it as such by default.

I believe tagging these as access=no is incorrect as that implies that nobody can legally use it in any way, which is not true for any of the ways updated here.

Appreciate the feedback, but it's worth noting that the tag access=all has not been provided in this case. Out of interest why are these now access=no? Doesn't that indicate that access is always prohibited? These are public pavements and I walk them daily.

While there is a village of Oakridge in Gloucestershire (Stroud area), there isn't one within the village of Highnam. Can this node be safely removed?

Forgot to tag source: local knowledge and Matthew Homes full site plan.