+ non-existent

1. Don't add historic features to OSM. Add them in OHM.
2. Don't use `natural=peak` directly.

Please move it to the correct location. Don't delete it.

`=peak` means a high point, not one big "mountain"

Why does this deletion even serve?

You damaged the `=mountain_range`

2. `=ridge` doesn't need to be strictly unbroken.

Please don't split a `=mountain_range`.

What does this even mean? Improve it. Don't delete it.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.

Please don't attach irrelevant objects on areas.

1. `place=` should be located in the sociocultural center, not the etymology of `natural=` . Please respect One Feature One Object.
2. Shel Lei Tau has nothing to do as Shek Lei Estate.

3. You don't need to add the terminus in `name=`, as you already added `from:*=` `to:*=`. This is a controversial practice, opposed because it's not a proper name, and cluttering with Tagging For Editior software.

1. Please see message
2. Please don't add these `network=`. They don't make sense, maybe only in eg `designation=` which is a hack. The originally `network=` using KMB is correct.

Please don't add descriptor labels in `name=`.

Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`, which is for proper names only. This is expressed in `description:zh=`, and `description:en=`. The object is carrying `demolished:aerialway=gondola`, highlighting the fact it should be the original name.

Please don't delete objects when renaming.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.

This is already represented by Ho Man Tin Hill. The existing situation is the area is referred to as Ho Man Tin district.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.

Please don't push your `official_name=`.
N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.