Please check that `leisure=playground` means a children's playground, not any "playground".

These are usually a descriptor label, not a proper name. They should be added to `description:zh=` (to be further tagged), not `name=`. TMTL 483 would be an acceptable one.

Please don't add no longer existing features to OSM. Add them in OpenHistoricalMap.

1. Sorry I don't understand that. The `addr:place=` on the `landuse=residential` is for addressing house-numbers. `place=village`, not `place=hamlet`, should be used when the inhabited population exceeds eg 100.
2. At least Google returns quite a lot of results when the query is refined locally. I already haven't added Sheung Shui North, despite some usage that exists out there.

Ok if you are unhappy with the names, please simply remove the `name=` from the `disused:amenity=school`. But the building still has name on it as far as I'm aware.

Please check this is a `disused:amenity=school` + `landuse=brownfield`. The name is still recorded on the building.

This needs `addr:place=`, not `name=`. (This also allows individually named housing projects addressed in the village to be shown correctly)

What does this do?

If you don't like `highway=junction`, fine. But don't add other tags that don't apply.

Have you checked what does `area:highway=` means?

This is definitely not one `area:highway=` roadway area. `highway=junction` was proposed before for a single object containing the entire area.

This is `landuse=highway`, not `area:highway=`. You can see it includes sidewalk and other surrounding areas.

There is already a correct address here.

It's actually a mistake on `addr:housenumber=` used for flats/units.

38 is the levels above ground, meaning the tower part is 39.

Actually you have count the 3 levels of carpark, so it is 41 in total.

The building is gone, but not the address

If they are connected separately, you should adjust accordingly

What's wrong with it?

If it contains an address, it shouldn't be removed.