1. You shouldn't remove the `building=` if the area is also representing the structure.
2. `man_made=wastewater_plant` is for treatment, not `man_made=pumping_station`.

At least in HK, there is ambiguity with what `bus=` means, so I add `bus=private` + `bus:conditional=yes @ (*)`. Another editor uses a less general `bus:*=`.

Same as `*:*-Hant=`. This is specified in IETP BCP 47, similar to ISO 3166 country and subdivision codes.

`:*-Latn=` is a code. It must be uppercase.

1. This is for the housing project, which is not yet opened.
2. The entire site is not covered by the podium.

Looks like a `=traffic_signals` typo?

Excuse me, I added `enforcement=maxspeed` to node/8742882313/history to show the sign. Is there any problem with this?

@mueschel
That's only covers half of the story. I remember there are often some narrow edges to stand on (barely walkable in comfort but still navagiable) on some sections; not sure if these should be considered a sidewalk. On the mountain side, there are drainage holes, and a shallow channel; additionally poor visibility that would be a safety concern.

@user_5359 Previously I found someone using `incline:name=` for the name of a slope elsewhere. `loc_name=` doesn't really qualify what it is based on. `*:etymology=` would be off, and not correspond to any Wikidata item or Wikipedia.

Please don't delete the object. The school campus still exists there. If you don't know what to do, simply remove the tags.

Please don't mention sources which will infringe copyright.

Please be extra cautious and don't remove things you haven't comprehended fully. `place=locality` has 2 use case here.
1. This may be for the demolished settlements around the Reservoir moved to the foothills.
2. Historically they would be yet-to-be established `natural=` tags viz `=ridge`, `=mountain_range`.
So this at least needs to be checked whether it should moved to a correct `=peak` location.

You removed the `highway=` tag in one object.

Please don't upload test edits. This is vandalism.

Please don't upload test edit. This is vandalism.

That's not entirely accurate. At least it shouldn't connect the same as the bus interchange. Plus, the main line itself is already offset to the east or misaligned relatively against the rest.

Can you explain why would you connect it so far downstream?

Please use the name of the feature to be built, not a descriptor label for the construction project.

Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`.

I don't know what's with https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/881831086, but they looked separate. Not sure what's going on with other land areas either.