Handled in message

Handled in message

Handled in message

Handled in message

Handled in message

next time

Thank you, but please don't remove the `ref=`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93872313

1, Please don't add `crossing=traffic_signals` where there isn't any crosswalk.
2. `access=permissive` isn't used in this manner.
3. `highway=motorway_link` already implies `foot=no` etc.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93867849

@__martin__ Many renders show `ref=` after the name in brackets.

Handled in message

This does. Previosuly when lane tags aren't in place and turning restriction aren't used, these would be modeled separately. Now that they are updated, it would still be obliged to use `highway=motorway_link` to reflect the last point of divergence. This was briefly discussed in changeset/92439833 with an open question. On the contrary, a roadway connecting to another roadway without the ability to continue on it would be debatable issue as well, as in way/88008410

1. As I mentioned, that is copyrighted, and shows different things.
2. The name of the interchange is put on the point of exit. This is the standard practice. Plus, there's no obvious tags for a single interchange feature object either.

It's a `highway=motorway_link` to reflect the lane restriction.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93801161

This implication is unfounded. There is no such assumption. Furthermore, this breaks continuity on `_link` classification.

Additionally, `destination:ref=`.
A non-standard `destination:motorway=` is used as a placeholder to clarify what a `motorway=no` means or leads to.

`highway=trunk` itself has no such issue, lacking physical and legal connotations, which may be handled by `noref=yes`

Although routers may overcome this situation, this emerged as a tentative compromise.

Making them `highway=motorway` may be worse.

This was discussed quite a few times already. This doesn't reflect the reality and practice where the connection to the `highway=motorway` is to be `highway=motorway_link`. There are a number of cases where expectations will fail. The details of this has been tentatively incorporated as `motorway=no`.

Please check that this is `highway=motorway_link`, not `highway=motorway`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93761856