Kovoschiz's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 87092295 | Please check the connections
|
|
| 87092222 | This is not correct. It is not considered R1's exit.
|
|
| 87089499 | Please don't remove and merge island-separated road
|
|
| 87065317 | This is a live database. Please don't commit vandalism. |
|
| 87031393 | Please use `tunnel:name=` for this/.
|
|
| 86935441 | This one should be a `highway=pedestrian`. Notice the lowered kerb. The bollards should be removable.
|
|
| 86932879 | This is R2's exit from Lei Yue Mun Rd
|
|
| 86904136 | I suggest `=unclassified` to factor in Hornsey Rd.
|
|
| 86879536 | Who do you think added those remarks? I explained several times on this. Why don't you yourself go and take everything into account. |
|
| 86879536 | Keep on repeating your own piece of dogma without looking at it, you won't go anywhere with this behavior |
|
| 86883892 | Not to mention to use descriptive changeset upload comments |
|
| 86883892 | Please keep your changesets local and relevant, and consult the local community before making signficiant changes.
|
|
| 86883976 | I don't see why you keep doing this despite previous discussions changeset/86886372
|
|
| 86883421 | changeset/86886317
|
|
| 86883421 | Again, please don't make streets "_link" for the sake of it.
|
|
| 86883492 | This is inconsistent, even after multiple discussions
|
|
| 86878500 | Please don't create an entire `=trunk_link` when there is none.
|
|
| 86879536 | Are you going to reply or what?
|
|
| 86833215 | The `=primary_link`s are correct as they were.
|
|
| 86782125 | Think about how they will be implemented as individual lines, without turning restrictions in place, as done historically before. |