OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
87608786

You also need to extend the crosswalk
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87608786

87608786

Don't forget `crossing=no` where it applies
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87608786

87573952

Thanks but `opening_date=` is not `start_date=`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87573952

87547846

Why would you want to do this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87547846

87319923

I changed it to a `abandoned:highway=path` first. By "user", are you working on an app, website, or any service?

87458719

https://osmcha.org/changesets/87459241
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87458719

87458792

https://osmcha.org/changesets/87459241
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87458792

87459241

This still breaks continuity.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87459241

87460203

Please notice `motorway=no`.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87460203

87404908

Please check Ma Wan's restriction. You are allowed to leave at any time once entered
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87404908

87396521

Please don't change it before it takes effect. Notice `construction:ref=`
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87396521

87319923

Is the foundation somehow covered up, or is it filled with vegetation?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87319923

87236484

"in an address only the country specific address components that the post office needs to deliver the mail belong to it." Yes, so I would invite you to get to know how things work here.

87236484

Please observe this territory. Here there's no lower administrative boundaries implemented, so these are information needed and commonly used (more so than street + house number) to describe the place. `landuse=` and `place=plot` areas alone aren't reliable or explicit enough.

87236484

It's not a `place=city_block` btw.

87236484

At a glance, I saw it has been used before in node/4380701777/history and node/7130431683/history. It's a direct application of `place=plot`. Not sure if it is considered in addressing (by geocoders and editiors alike), so thought I should tag it explicitly. Moreover, the names are commonly used.

87189317

Use `description:zh=` for these if you are unsure what to tag.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87189317

84268013

Please don't map lanes separately
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84268013

84268812

Please don't map lanes separately
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84268812

87091840

Again, this is not what `highway=primary` means.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87091840